Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In a distressing disclosure that has reverberated through both the medical and legal communities, a California couple has initiated a lawsuit against a fertility doctor for allegedly using an unknown sperm donor instead of the husband’s genetic material during their IVF treatments in the 1980s. Jane and John Roe's pursuit of justice stems from a shocking revelation discovered through a DNA test taken by one of their twin daughters in January 2023, which unveiled that neither daughter shares a biological connection with John. Decades ago, the Roes struggled with infertility and sought the expertise of Dr. Hal C. Danzer, a Los Angeles-based IVF specialist, beginning their journey in 1983. After facing three unsuccessful IVF attempts, Jane finally became pregnant with twins in April 1984; tragically, the infants were stillborn shortly after delivery. Determined to expand their family, the couple underwent another round of IVF, resulting in the birth of healthy twin daughters in June 1986. Despite the joy of their healthy births, the couple remained unaware of the critical error that would later come to light. The unsettling truth emerged when one of the twins, driven by curiosity about her ancestry, submitted a DNA test. The results were startling and pointed to a significant breach of trust: while genetic ties to her mother were confirmed, there was a complete absence of ties to her supposed father. This revelation prompted an investigation that ultimately uncovered the shocking fact that Dr. Danzer had used sperm from an unknown donor during the fertilization process. In response to this violation, Jane has filed a lawsuit against Dr. Danzer, characterizing his actions as "medical rape." This term highlights the severity of the violation, as it underscores the absence of consent in using another man's sperm. The grief and emotional turmoil that have ensued for both parents have been profound, with Jane expressing feelings of violation and John grappling with a shattered identity as a father. The impact of the revelation has left John reeling as he confronts the reality that he is not the biological father of the children he raised. Compounding their anguish, the family has discovered that their daughter has 16 biological half-siblings conceived through Dr. Danzer's procedures during a decades-long period. The implications of these findings have raised significant concerns about the health history of the biological father, leading to anxiety over potential hereditary health risks for the twins. As the couple seeks damages for medical battery, emotional distress, and malpractice, their case has brought to light critical issues surrounding ethical practices in fertility treatments. Legal experts emphasize that the unauthorized use of sperm is a grave violation of medical ethics and patient rights. The lawsuit not only seeks compensation for the Roes’ emotional and psychological suffering but also serves as a call for accountability within the fertility industry. The ongoing case has ignited a discussion on the ethical responsibilities of fertility doctors, particularly concerning informed consent and patients' rights. With the Roes now demanding legal recourse, they hope to bring attention to these critical issues and prevent similar occurrences in the future. As the legal proceedings unfold, the family stands resolute in their quest for justice and recognition of the profound emotional toll that has accompanied this decades-old violation.