Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In the wake of natural disasters, school districts face the daunting task of securing federal financial assistance to rebuild and recover, a process that can be particularly challenging for those navigating it for the first time. With increasing frequency and severity of disasters linked to climate change, it is likely that more districts will need to rely on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for funding to cover critical repairs, debris removal, and temporary facilities. During a recent webinar hosted by AASA, The School Superintendents Association, leaders from districts that have successfully navigated post-disaster recovery shared invaluable lessons and strategies to help others maximize FEMA funding. Here are three key tips they emphasized for district leaders to consider after a natural disaster. First and foremost, comprehensive documentation is essential. Kayla Smith, executive director of finance for the Katy school district in Texas, stressed the importance of taking clear photographs and videos of the damage before and after repairs. This visual evidence should capture every angle and detail, including the specific locations of the damage, as FEMA may require precise GPS coordinates. Furthermore, she advised that documentation should not be vague; it’s crucial to specify how the damage occurred, whether it was due to rising water or wind-blown rain. This level of detail will help ensure that all aspects of the damage are accounted for when seeking funding. Secondly, meticulous tracking of funding sources is vital. Karen Smith, chief financial officer of the Cypress-Fairbanks school district, highlighted the importance of understanding the various agencies involved in disaster recovery funding, as each may impose different restrictions on how the money can be spent. By maintaining clear records of expenditures and ensuring that funds are allocated efficiently, districts can maximize their reimbursements. She cautioned against the tendency to underestimate potential reimbursement eligibility by dismissing seemingly minor expenses. Instead, districts should explore all avenues for funding, as what may appear insignificant could, in fact, qualify for partial reimbursement. Finally, establishing a structured communication hub for essential staff can significantly enhance recovery efforts. Mary Sakuma, county superintendent of schools in Oroville, California, recounted the experience of the Camp Fire, which devastated her district in 2018. In the aftermath, a central control center was established to facilitate staff collaboration, enabling them to manage essential tasks, process payroll, and address pressing needs efficiently. Regular meetings ensured that any unmet needs were swiftly communicated and addressed, making their recovery process more organized and effective. As districts prepare for the possibility of future disasters, they must also remain vigilant about the longevity of their documentation. The requirements imposed by FEMA can extend for years, as illustrated by Karen Smith's experience with audits related to Hurricane Harvey. Maintaining thorough records and ensuring that knowledgeable staff members remain available to answer questions long after the disaster is crucial for a smooth reimbursement process. In conclusion, as climate change continues to pose challenges to educational institutions across the country, district leaders must be proactive in their disaster recovery planning. By implementing meticulous documentation practices, effectively managing funding sources, and fostering strong communication among staff, school districts can enhance their chances of successfully navigating the complexities of FEMA funding and emerge resilient in the wake of natural disasters.