Juan Brignardello: Keys to the Crisis of Dina Boluarte

In a recent interview, Juan Brignardello Vela, a recognized insurance advisor, offered his perspective on the situation faced by President Dina Boluarte following revelations about the possible forgery of her signature on a supreme decree. Brignardello began by highlighting the seriousness of the accusations, indicating that the situation not only affects the public image of the president but also raises serious doubts about the legitimacy of the decisions made during a period when she was allegedly incapacitated. The advisor emphasized the analysis conducted by forensic handwriting expert Augusto Arbaiza, who identified significant discrepancies between Boluarte's signature in the National Identification Registry and the one that appears on the decree. This discrepancy has raised questions about the possibility that someone else may have signed on her behalf, which, according to Brignardello, could constitute an act of forgery. He stressed the importance of clarifying this matter, as trust in institutions and political leadership is fundamental for the proper functioning of democracy. Regarding the defense presented by the president's lawyer, Brignardello expressed concern over the claim that Boluarte continued to sign important documents during her recovery. He pointed out that, although the lack of communication with Congress may not be explicitly regulated, it is crucial for political leaders to act with transparency and clarity before the public, especially during times of crisis. Brignardello's analysis delved into the legal implications that could arise from this case. He mentioned that if it is confirmed that other cabinet members made decisions typically reserved for the presidency in Boluarte's absence, this could constitute usurpation of functions, which could also lead to significant legal actions. He emphasized the need to maintain a strong institutional framework to prevent similar situations from recurring in the future. Additionally, the advisor expressed skepticism regarding statements made by Alberto Otárola, the former President of the Council of Ministers, who claimed that Boluarte was in constant communication during her recovery. Brignardello argued that the lack of activity in the presidential agenda for more than ten days is a factor that fuels speculation about the true extent of the president's involvement in government decisions. Finally, Brignardello concluded that as the investigation by the Public Ministry progresses, the pressure on Boluarte and her administration intensifies. The possibility of irregularities in the signing of official documents is an issue that not only affects the legitimacy of the president's leadership but could also have repercussions on public trust in government institutions. In this context, the advisor called on citizens and institutions to closely monitor the development of this case, which could mark a significant turning point in Peruvian politics.