Trump's Return: A Threat to Democracy or a Populist Resurgence? The World is Watching

In the midst of a polarized global political landscape, the reemergence of Donald Trump as President of the United States has reignited discussions about the very nature of American democracy. As the world watched his inauguration on January 20, 2025, it was impossible to ignore the troubling signs of what some analysts are calling a "kakistocracy"—a government run by the least qualified individuals. Trump’s combative rhetoric and controversial executive orders echo sentiments that resonate with a significant portion of the American electorate, particularly those eager for a far-right agenda. His promises to deport immigrants, deny climate change, and impose higher tariffs may face constitutional challenges, but they serve as a balm for the anger and frustration of his supporters. This populist wave is redolent of past authoritarian movements, where the whims of a leader often overshadow the principles of democracy. The American presidency, as noted by historical figures like Benjamin Franklin, has long been a subject of debate. Franklin’s words, "A republic, if you can keep it," serve as a stark reminder that the health of American democracy is precarious. Trump's disdain for dissent—viewing disagreement as disloyalty—further blurs the lines between a republic and monarchy, a sentiment echoed by critics who fear the emergence of an imperial presidency. The implications of this shift are profound, not just for the U.S., but for the world. The concentration of power in the hands of a leader who embodies both the spirit of American individualism and the machinations of a plutocratic elite threatens to undermine democratic ideals. The presence of billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos at Trump’s inauguration highlights this troubling trend, suggesting that wealth is becoming an increasing determinant of political influence. Furthermore, the historical context of American governance reveals a persistent struggle to achieve true equality. Although landmark legislation like the Civil Rights Act promised civic equality, systemic discrimination remains ingrained in the fabric of American society. The expansion of presidential power, often justified through executive orders, has led to a troubling normalization of nepotism and cronyism. As Trump seeks to impose his brand of governance—one characterized by populist and jingoistic rhetoric—there is a danger of escalating tensions both domestically and internationally. His rhetoric may play well to his base, but it raises alarms for those who value reasoned discourse and civil rights. For countries like Nepal, which has historically looked to the U.S. for support, the ramifications of Trump's policies could be significant. However, the anticipated impacts may be overstated, especially as Nepal navigates its geopolitical landscape in the wake of China's Belt and Road Initiative. In this climate, the emergence of what can only be termed "amoralocracies"—governments governed by the principles of might, wealth, and ethnonationalism—signals a troubling trend. The normalization of political amorality could embolden leaders who exploit fear and division, undermining the values of pluralism and equality that underpin democratic systems. As the world adjusts to the implications of a Trump presidency, it becomes increasingly clear that the battle for the soul of democracy is far from over. The risks of a return to tribalism and authoritarianism loom large, and societies must remain vigilant in defense of their democratic institutions. The challenge ahead is not merely to oppose the authoritarian tendencies of leaders like Trump but to actively reaffirm the principles of democracy that ensure every voice is heard and valued.