Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In recent weeks, Argentina's public health system has faced significant cuts that have raised concerns among health professionals, specialists, and the general population. Through decree 1138/24, published in the Official Gazette at the end of 2024, the national government has initiated a process of staff reduction that will impact various institutions and hospitals across the country. This decision was officially communicated via social media, where it was announced that the contracts of 1,400 workers would not be renewed. The public health system is vital for nearly 27% of the Argentine population who do not have access to social security or private healthcare providers. In a context where private health insurance companies have seen a decline in their members due to price increases and growing informal labor, it is expected that more people will turn to the public system. However, this staff reduction raises serious doubts about the system's capacity to meet increasing demand. The impact of these non-renewals is not limited to a specific number of hospitals but extends to key entities such as the National Cancer Institute, PAMI (the National Institute of Social Services for Retirees and Pensioners), and several national hospitals, among others. The lack of clear and detailed information about which specific areas will be affected has created uncertainty within the medical community. The elimination of personnel in highly specialized areas, such as the departments of communicable diseases, has been particularly alarming. The reaction from the scientific and medical community has been swift. The Argentine Society of Infectology (SADI) has requested a meeting with the Minister of Health to discuss the consequences of these decisions on equitable access to healthcare. There are fears that the restructuring of the ministry will affect critical areas of health and epidemiological control, which are essential for public health in the country. Within the Ministry, attempts have been made to reassure those involved by stating that health programs will not be compromised. However, experts warn that the reduction of specialized personnel could impact the effectiveness of key programs, such as vaccination and infectious disease control. Despite the ministry's assurances, many in the health field believe that reducing human resources cannot be done without repercussions on the functioning of these critical areas. Deputy Pablo Yedlin has raised the issue in Congress, arguing that the lack of personnel in areas such as the National Directorate of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases could lead to a deterioration in already concerning health indicators, such as low vaccination coverage and an increase in cases of diseases like tuberculosis. In his view, this situation jeopardizes public health and could result in a health disaster. Other groups, such as the Huésped Foundation, have expressed their concern over the dismantling of areas essential for the treatment of diseases like HIV. The closure of these services would be interpreted not only as a setback in terms of public health but also as a violation of international commitments that Argentina has made regarding the right to health. The ministry has assured that there will be no budget cuts, but rather savings in expenses due to the reduction of the hierarchical structure, which has been questioned by numerous experts. The lack of specialized technical personnel could result in insufficient care and an inability to adequately respond to the health needs of the population. Meanwhile, the debate over the state's responsibility in healthcare provision is intensifying. The government seems to be opening the door to greater decentralization of health responsibilities to the provinces, a strategy that has generated fears about the potential privatization of certain health services. In this regard, the question arises as to how the quality and equitable access to health will be guaranteed if state intervention is reduced. Ultimately, the cuts to the health system appear to contradict the lessons learned during the pandemic, where strengthening the system was crucial to addressing the health crisis. With mental health, for example, being one of the most affected areas, the decision to dismantle already existing services raises serious doubts about the future of the health system in Argentina and its ability to respond to the needs of its population in a context of increasing precariousness.