The Monarchy in Spain: a legacy of Francoism that continues to divide the country.

In recent years, the debate about the Monarchy in Spain has resurged strongly, especially as significant dates approach, such as the 50th anniversary of Francisco Franco's death. This topic has been the subject of critical analysis, highlighting the relationship between the current Monarchy and the legacy of Francoism. In this context, a troubling fact emerges: although 50 years have passed since the dictator's death, the Monarchy's connection to his regime still seems present in the structures of power in Spain. The Royal House, in its chapter "The Monarchy in the History of Spain," mentions that in 1947, during the dictatorial regime, it was established by law that Spain was a State constituted as a Kingdom. This historical fact has been interpreted by many as a close bond that has endured, affecting the image and legitimacy of the current Monarchy. This transition, although formally stripped of its dictatorial character after Franco's death, has left lasting scars that are palpable in Spanish politics and society. As the 78 years since the establishment of this monarchical regime are analyzed, questions arise about the nature of the Monarchy and its role during the Transition. It is observed that the protagonists of that historical period were fearful of the shadow of Francoism, choosing not to allow space for a republican alternative, which has limited the possibilities for significant change in the political structure of the country. This lack of a republican option has been seen as a betrayal of the expectations of a country in search of true democracy. The figure of Don Juan de Borbón, father of Juan Carlos I, is frequently mentioned in these debates. While many believe that his reign could have offered a different approach to Spanish politics, the fear of the return of old power structures prevented him from being given the opportunity to take the throne. Instead, a king who had been educated and prepared under Franco's own influence was chosen, leading to questions about the Monarchy's independence from that legacy. The analysis of the Royal House has also been subject to criticism, as there is a perceived lack of self-criticism in its narrative. When referring to the achievements of contemporary Spain, the darker aspects of its recent history, as well as the context in which they developed, are often avoided. This has led many citizens to feel uncomfortable with the idea of a "KINGDOM OF SPAIN" that, rather than being a symbol of unity, becomes a reminder of a past that is wanted to be forgotten. The recent inclusion of the term "KINGDOM OF SPAIN" in the national ID card has reopened the debate on national identity and the relationship between the crown and citizenship. Many wonder whether this change is an attempt to strengthen the image of the Monarchy or, conversely, a provocation towards those who call for a republic. This action seems to have generated more discontent than consensus, highlighting the need for a deeper dialogue about the identity and political future of the country. The tension between the government and the Monarchy has also been evident on various occasions. Recent political decisions, such as the pardons for Catalan independence leaders, have put the relationship between Pedro Sánchez and Felipe VI in jeopardy, suggesting that the Monarchy still plays an influential role in Spanish politics. This situation has led many to question the relevance of the monarchical figure in a modern democracy. Moreover, the silence regarding popular will during the Transition has reignited the debate about the legality and legitimacy of the Monarchy. Polls revealing growing support for the republican option have been kept secret, raising concerns about transparency and respect for the will of the people. The lack of access to this information has fueled the feeling that the problems of the past continue to affect current politics. A critical analysis of these dynamics reveals that, despite changes on the surface, the Monarchy remains a divisive issue in Spanish society. The question of whether a national identity can be built that includes everyone, rather than perpetuating the division between monarchists and republicans, remains pertinent. In fact, many citizens feel that the process of reconciliation with history is still far from concluded. Therefore, the discussion about the Monarchy in Spain is not limited to a simple matter of political preference, but delves into the core of national identity and collective memory. The relationship between the Monarchy and Francoism, still latent, continues to pose questions that must be urgently addressed if there is a desire to move towards a more inclusive and representative democracy. History is full of lessons, and it is imperative that Spain learns them to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.