Ruth Ligarda and her statement generate controversy over Boluarte's security.

In an increasingly complicated political context for Dina Boluarte's government, the appointment of Ruth Ligarda, her personal escort, as part of the auxiliary team at the police attaché office of the Peruvian embassy in Spain has sparked intense debate. The non-commissioned officer of the National Police of Peru has been called to testify before the Public Prosecutor's Office, where she provided details about the president's visit to a condominium in the south of the country on February 24, 2024. These statements have raised a series of questions regarding presidential security and the government's management. In her statement on December 12, 2024, Ligarda clarified that she was not present during the meeting of the president at the Mikonos condominium, which has fueled speculation about her role in the incident. She stated that her day off was on February 24 and that she returned to her duties the following day. This clarification has led some to question the transparency of the events surrounding that day and whether there was indeed a security breach or a misunderstanding in coordinating the details. Ligarda recounted that during her duties, she communicated via WhatsApp with the previous shift and began her journey to kilometer 108 of the Panamericana Sur. She described leaving around 7:15 in the morning with the entire convoy and heading to pick up the president, although she could not recall the exact name of the location where they found her. Such details, while seemingly minor, become crucial within the framework of the ongoing investigation. Upon arriving at the condominium, Ligarda detailed that the place had characteristics similar to a set of houses, and that upon entering the parking lot, President Boluarte approached the vehicle on foot. The non-commissioned officer mentioned that the president was accompanied by a person whose identity she could not identify, a point that could be relevant to the context of the investigation. The circumstances under which this meeting occurred have been subject to analysis and various interpretations in the political sphere. The Public Prosecutor's Office, in light of the absence of certain details, requested Ligarda to specify the procedure for picking up the president. This interrogation included presenting a map of the condominium to identify the exact location where the vehicle was parked. However, President Boluarte's defense objected to this question, arguing that it was suggestive, adding another layer of complexity to the situation. The situation is further exacerbated considering that this is not the first time the president has faced questions about her security and the management of her team. As the year draws to a close, Boluarte finds herself under scrutiny, with an approval rating that has dramatically fallen to just 3%. This context has led many analysts to question the political future of the president and her ability to face the challenges ahead. Additionally, various sectors have begun to express their concern over what they consider political interference in Ligarda's assignment to the embassy in Spain. Some argue that this decision may have been influenced by the need to protect the president internationally, while others view it as an attempt to divert attention from the investigations surrounding her. In this tense climate, Ruth Ligarda's figure has become a focal point. Her role as the president's escort and her recent testimony have highlighted not only the internal functioning of presidential security but also the doubts that persist regarding the integrity of Boluarte's government. These events have led the public to question not only the effectiveness of security measures but also the transparency in public management. The coming days will be crucial for the outcome of this case. Public attention will be focused not only on the statements made by non-commissioned officer Ligarda but also on how the government will respond to these questions. The way Boluarte and her administration handle this crisis could define her political future. In an environment where trust in institutions is declining, the president's ability to address these dilemmas will be a determining factor for her continued tenure in office.