SUNEDU closes five universities for failing to meet educational quality standards.

The recent decision by the National Superintendency of Higher University Education (SUNEDU) has marked a significant milestone in the Peruvian educational system by formally signaling the closure of five universities that failed to meet the Basic Quality Conditions (CBC) required for their licensing. This process, which has been underway since 2015, aims to raise educational standards and ensure that institutions operating in the country do so under principles of quality and transparency. The affected universities will receive notifications to cease activities during the 2024-2025 period, an outcome that has generated concern among students, parents, and the educational sector in general. Despite the pursuit of a more robust and efficient system, the situation highlights the fragility of some educational institutions that were unable to adapt to the requirements established by SUNEDU. In contrast, around 50% of the evaluated institutions have obtained licensing, suggesting a clear division between those that have opted for continuous improvement and those that have fallen behind. Among the universities denied licensing are some well-known names, adding a layer of intrigue to the situation. SUNEDU has revealed that multiple factors led to this decision, ranging from inconsistencies in enrollment figures to deficiencies in infrastructure and complementary services. In particular, cases were mentioned of universities that could not guarantee the safety of their facilities or the continuity of services such as psychological and sports support, which are essential for the holistic development of students. One of the most alarming aspects is the lack of reliable information from some of these universities. During the evaluation process, it was found that certain institutions presented multiple versions of the number of enrolled students, raising doubts about their management capacity and transparency. This situation underscores a larger problem in the Peruvian educational landscape, where trust in institutions is compromised by the lack of clarity and consistency in their operations. Additionally, infrastructure studies revealed that many of these universities did not meet minimum safety standards, a vital aspect for ensuring a safe learning environment. The precariousness of facilities, especially those housing medical programs, endangers not only students but also the community at large, as they handle materials and equipment that require safe and specialized management. The problems are not limited to infrastructure alone. SUNEDU also reported that some universities lacked a solid waste and liquid waste management system, which is fundamental for public health and environmental well-being. This omission highlights a lack of a culture of responsibility and sustainability in the operations of these institutions. On the other hand, it is evident that some universities did not have adequate mechanisms to ensure research and knowledge creation. Deficiencies in research project management and a lack of protection for intellectual property are aspects that limit not only educational quality but also the academic output of the affected institutions. SUNEDU has implemented a mechanism to reintegrate universities with denied licenses into a quality educational system, reflecting the agency's commitment to not leaving any student without options. However, it is vital to maintain rigorous monitoring of the institutions seeking to revalidate their status to ensure that necessary standards are met. This situation invites deep reflection on the future of the university system in Peru. It is imperative that both educational institutions and regulatory bodies work hand in hand to create an environment that promotes quality and continuous improvement. Education, as a pillar of development, cannot be viewed merely as a product to offer, but as an ever-evolving process that requires commitment and adaptability. Finally, the closure of these universities should serve as a wake-up call for all stakeholders involved in the educational system. Quality should not be a goal to achieve, but a permanent commitment. With the advancement of evaluation and licensing in the university system, it is essential to strengthen efforts to improve education in the country, ensuring that every student has access to quality training that enables them to successfully face future challenges.