"Reactions of the Peruvian left to the elections in Venezuela reflect political immaturity."

The recent presidential election in Venezuela has unleashed a torrent of reactions that reveal the immaturity and lack of principles of the Peruvian left. The outcome of this election, marred by irregularities and questions about the transparency of the process, has unfortunately been met by some Peruvian politicians with a blind approval that is concerning. This phenomenon not only calls into question their commitment to democratic values but also reflects the left's inability to criticize authoritarian regimes when they share their ideology. The elections held last Sunday, in which Nicolás Maduro was declared the winner without the support of recognized independent observers, have reignited protests in a country that has been the scene of human rights violations on multiple occasions. The international community, as well as various human rights organizations, have demanded a transparent vote recount, something the Chavista regime seems determined to avoid. In this context, the reaction of certain sectors of Peruvian politics is bewildering. A group of Peruvian congress members, including Flavio Cruz, María Agüero, and Kelly Portalatino, has rushed to declare the validity of the electoral process in Venezuela, applauding what many consider a monumental fraud. This behavior is not only irresponsible but also exposes a troubling complicity with a regime that has proven to be a systematic violator of human rights. The actions of these politicians, who traveled to Venezuela as "observers," demonstrate how some become tools of the system, willing to lend legitimacy to a process that clearly lacks it. The fact that these congress members not only support but also attempt to validate the election results is a clear indication of a lack of political discernment that could have repercussions on the public perception of the left. The absence of criticism towards Chavismo and their refusal to distance themselves from a regime that has led their country to moral and economic ruin is undoubtedly a sign of political immaturity. The situation is even more alarming when observing figures like Vladimir Cerrón, leader of the Perú Libre party, celebrating Maduro's victory from the shadows. This attitude reveals a loyalty to ideology above ethics and human rights, a trend that has perpetuated throughout the history of various currents of the Latin American left. The inability of some leaders to openly condemn the Chavista dictatorship reflects a continuity in the adoration of tyrants, as was previously evident with figures like Fidel Castro. On the other hand, the more cautious reactions of other leftist representatives, such as Verónika Mendoza, are also reprehensible. Her ambiguous rhetoric and inability to firmly condemn Maduro's regime demonstrate that, despite the abuses and repression, ideological cohesion prevails over the defense of democracy. This selective silence and her attempt to equate the Venezuelan opposition with Maduro's regime indicate a lack of principles that is hard to ignore. The case of legislators Roberto Sánchez and Sigrid Bazán is also revealing. Their silence regarding the Venezuelan situation becomes even more noticeable considering that they only present their defense of democracy when it comes to regimes that do not share their ideology. This double standard is concerning and calls into question their true conviction in defending human rights and democratic processes. Ultimately, what is happening in Venezuela is a mirror reflecting the failures of the Peruvian left. The inability to distance themselves from authoritarian regimes that share their political vision suggests that the path toward political maturity remains long and tortuous. History has taught us that complicity with dictatorships can not only destroy political capital but can also lead to voter disillusionment. It is crucial that Peruvian citizens do not forget this lesson. The election of leaders who truly defend democratic values and human rights is vital in a context where authoritarianism continues to threaten freedom. The stance of some Peruvian politicians regarding the situation in Venezuela should serve as a reminder that ideology cannot be an excuse to ignore the reality of power abuses. The struggle for democracy and social justice must go hand in hand with the condemnation of all forms of tyranny, without exceptions or justifications.