"Controversy over the 'Impunity Law' sparks reactions in Peruvian politics and society."

The recent announcement by the Government regarding the enactment of the regulation that reiterates the terms of the controversial 'Impunity Law' has unleashed a torrent of reactions in the political and social spheres of the country. Despite warnings from the Supreme Court regarding the unconstitutionality of this law, the Executive has decided to move forward, raising questions about the State's commitment to the principle of justice. The 'Impunity Law,' which was approved in May of this year, establishes that the suspension of the statute of limitations for crimes is limited to a maximum of one year. This regulation, which has been the subject of intense debate, was reaffirmed on July 1 by the Permanent Commission with 17 votes in favor, 5 against, and 2 abstentions. However, the Supreme Court has expressed its disagreement with this legislation, indicating that the established timeframes do not allow for adequate clarification of crimes, especially in complex cases. The controversy surrounding this law resides not only in its content but also in the political context in which it has developed. The promulgation took place amid celebrations for National Holidays, which many consider a disrespect to democratic principles and to the memory of those who fought for the country's independence. Nevertheless, the Government has maintained that this law is part of a broader criminal policy and that its application is reasonable and proportional. Proponents of the 'Impunity Law' argue that the regulation seeks to protect the rights of the accused within a "guaranteeing accusatory system." However, many critics believe that this law favors those who have committed crimes, allowing them to evade justice under legal pretexts. This duality in the interpretation of the law has generated deep divisions in Peruvian society, especially between those demanding justice and those advocating for procedural guarantees. The situation is further complicated by the recent plenary agreement of the Supreme Court, which reaffirms the unconstitutionality of the 'Soto Law,' another piece of legislation that has generated controversy. This agreement establishes that judges should not apply norms that unreasonably limit the statute of limitations for crimes, opening a debate about the ability of the judicial system to handle cases of corruption and other serious crimes. In this context, the role of Congress becomes crucial. Despite opposition to the 'Impunity Law,' the parliamentary majority has continued to advance its validity, leading many to question the legitimacy of its decisions. The insistence on maintaining this law, despite judicial warnings, reflects a lack of willingness to reform a system that many consider failed and that does not guarantee justice for victims. Human rights organizations and various sectors of civil society have expressed their rejection of this law, arguing that it perpetuates a cycle of impunity that severely affects public trust in institutions. The possibility that criminals escape justice due to such short statutes of limitations generates a sense of unease and frustration among citizens, who yearn for a more robust and effective judicial system. The enactment of this law on a symbolic date such as the anniversary of independence raises serious concerns about the direction the country is taking in terms of justice and accountability. The decisions of the Government and Congress on this matter could mark a turning point in Peru's history, where the fight against corruption and the defense of human rights are in a delicate balance. As the country moves toward an uncertain future, it is vital for citizens to remain informed and active in defending their rights. The struggle for equitable justice and the elimination of impunity must be a priority for all, as only then can a fairer and more democratic nation be built. The resistance to the 'Impunity Law' is not just a legal issue, but a call to collective consciousness in the pursuit of a more integral Peru.