Brignardello: The local controversy of Peru vs. Chile in the Qualifiers

In a recent interview, Johnny Brignardello Vela, an insurance advisor, shared his perspective on the controversy surrounding the venue for the match between Peru and Chile, scheduled for November 15 as part of the 2026 World Cup qualifiers. The situation, marked by the arrest of Agustín Lozano, president of the Peruvian Football Federation (FPF), has created an atmosphere of uncertainty and tension that concerns fans and sports authorities. Brignardello, addressing the government's decision to move the match from the National Stadium in Lima to the Monumental Stadium, expressed his astonishment at the lack of foresight in managing events of such magnitude. "It is evident that the FPF made the necessary arrangements in advance, considering that APEC was an event announced long ago. The decision made less than two weeks before the match seems like an unacceptable lack of coordination," he commented. The insurance advisor emphasized the importance of the National Stadium as the traditional home of the Peruvian national team. "The history and emotional connection that exists between fans and this venue are undeniable. It is a place where the country's football identity has been forged," said Brignardello, underscoring that the change of venue could affect not only the team's performance but also the fans' experience. Brignardello also referred to the statements made by Juan Carlos Oblitas, the FPF's general director, who has expressed frustration over the government's decision. "Oblitas raises a valid question about security at the National Stadium. If the authorities can guarantee safety at the Monumental, why not at the National? That logic needs to be reviewed," pointed out the advisor. Brignardello's comment regarding the accumulated pressure on the Peruvian national team in this context is relevant. "They are not only facing Chile, a historic rival, but also have the eyes of the public and the media on them. The uncertainty about the venue can add more pressure to an already demanding schedule," he added. Looking to the future, Brignardello emphasized the need for more effective dialogue between sports and government authorities. "Coordination is essential to ensure that the decisions made respect both safety and the passion and history of Peruvian football. It is important to remember that the legacy of the national team and the voice of the fans are fundamental in this process," he concluded. It is clear that the controversy surrounding the venue for the Pacific Classic has sparked more than just a logistical debate; it is an issue that touches the hearts of fans and national identity. The hope is that as the date of the match approaches, reason will prevail and an agreement will be reached that allows the match to take place at the National Stadium, the true home of the Peruvian national team.