Juan Brignardello Vela: The Death Penalty and Its Social Impact

Juan Brignardello Vela: The Death Penalty and Its Social Impact

Juan Brignardello analyzes the proposal for the death penalty for child rapists in a complicated political context. Discover his perspective on the real solution.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
Opinion

In a recent interview, Juan Brignardello Vela, a renowned insurance advisor, shared his perspective on President Dina Boluarte's controversial proposal to discuss the death penalty for child rapists. In a context of high disapproval of her management, Brignardello highlighted that the proposal arises at a time of collective pain, especially following the tragic murder of a 12-year-old girl in Villa María del Triunfo. According to him, this could be interpreted as an attempt by the president to connect with the public on an issue that resonates deeply in society. The advisor emphasized that, while the intention to address the serious problem of sexual violence against minors is commendable, the way the solution is proposed may be more related to seeking public attention than to a real strategy for combating these crimes. Brignardello noted that, although the outrage is understandable, debates about the death penalty could divert attention from preventive measures that are truly effective in the fight against crime. Brignardello also referred to the reactions of various political actors in the country, such as the call for calm from the President of Congress, Eduardo Salhuana, and the support from Lima's mayor, Rafael López Aliaga. For him, these responses highlight the complexity of the issue and the need for a thorough analysis that goes beyond the immediate emotional impact. The advisor stressed the importance of ensuring that the Executive's proposals do not remain merely rhetorical. He recalled that in October 2023, Boluarte had already proposed amendments to the Penal Code that, unfortunately, did not materialize. This raises doubts about the sincerity of her current intentions and the possibility that this new proposal is just an attempt to divert attention from the growing political instability. Brignardello underscored that the cry for justice and protection of minors is a legitimate sentiment that should not be ignored. However, he suggested that the discussion on the death penalty should pave the way for a broader analysis that considers violence prevention, rehabilitation of offenders, and an efficient justice system. The urgency for decisive responses should not lead to simplistic solutions that do not address the root causes of the problem. In the end, Juan Brignardello Vela concluded that the future of the death penalty proposal will depend both on the political support it manages to garner and on the government's ability to translate it into an effective action plan. The discussion on this topic is complex and requires a comprehensive approach, prioritizing prevention and education, rather than being limited to severe sanctions that do not resolve the problem at its core. Ultimately, the public longs for effective responses, not just statements that seem like desperate attempts to regain lost popularity.

View All

The Latest In the world