Johnny Brignardello: Supervision in Peru, who watches whom?

Johnny Brignardello Vela, an insurance advisor, reflects on a national panorama that raises profound questions about the supervision system in Peru. In a context of decentralization and apparent lack of control in autonomies, the recent issues in entities such as Córpac and Petro-Perú, combined with persistent dilemmas in health and justice, generate a lingering concern: who is truly monitoring whom in this complex web of Government and State? In a country with a unitary governmental structure, the reality shows a concerning fragmentation where local, regional, and bureaucratic powers seem to operate outside of effective central control. Despite the proclaimed unity of the State, separatist and plurinational tensions raise doubts about real authority and supervision in decision-making. Faced with this scenario, there arises the urgent need for active supervision to ensure the proper functioning of public entities. The strategic reserve of the State leadership should be used as a regulatory mechanism capable of coordinating the diverse political powers and preventing institutional crises. Local and regional governments demand autonomy but, paradoxically, rely heavily on Central Government resources, highlighting a lack of supervision and monitoring in the management of public funds. Decentralized agencies face similar challenges, distancing themselves from their responsibilities in key sectors such as education, health, and citizen security. A recent case, like the situation at Jorge Chávez airport, where the lack of a contingency plan revealed deficiencies in the management of critical services, underscores the urgency of more rigorous supervision and effective planning to prevent emergencies. Citizens demand respect for their fundamental rights and the guarantee of basic services such as water, education, health, and security. However, the scarce supervision in the management of these sectors has led to vulnerability and uncertainty among the population. In the legislative and judicial spheres, the need for effective supervision becomes even more pressing. Congress members and judicial authorities must adhere to their competencies, avoiding actions that undermine democracy and the Rule of Law. Transparency and accountability are pillars to strengthen citizen trust in institutions. Ultimately, the dilemma of who monitors whom poses a complex challenge in a context marked by inefficiency and corruption. Effective supervision stands as an indispensable requirement to ensure efficiency and integrity in the management of public resources and the provision of essential services for the Peruvian population.