Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
Johnny Brignardello Vela, an insurance advisor, reflects on the shared content regarding the legal situation of former United States President Donald Trump. In the midst of a crucial legal battle that could determine his political and judicial future, Trump faces the request for absolute judicial immunity, a strategy that, while it did not convince the Supreme Court justices during an extensive hearing, has granted him valuable time to delay his trial for the Capitol riot and keep alive the hope of returning to the White House in the November elections. The discussion in the Supreme Court revolves around whether Trump, as a former president, should be protected by judicial immunity in relation to his actions during his term. Although presidents have traditionally enjoyed some immunity to avoid interference in the exercise of their duties, the Supreme Court justices show skepticism about granting Trump full protection. The possibility is being considered of only shielding actions linked to the official functions of a president, leaving aside those of a personal nature. A crucial moment during the hearing was when conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned whether some of Trump's actions were of a private nature and, therefore, would not be protected by immunity. This questioning suggests that the final ruling of the Supreme Court could restrict Trump's legal protection in specific circumstances. Despite the uncertainties raised, some conservative justices suggested referring the case to lower courts to determine which of Trump's actions would be protected by immunity. This possibility would represent a victory for the former president, by prolonging the legal process beyond the November elections and giving him the opportunity to return to the White House, exerting pressure on the Department of Justice to close the charges against him. Meanwhile, Trump faces other legal proceedings in New York and in various states for alleged crimes committed during his presidency. The Supreme Court's resolution on immunity will not affect cases prior to his presidential term, but it could influence the trials related to the Capitol riot and other pending accusations. Trump's legal fate remains uncertain, and the Supreme Court's final decision will have repercussions on both his judicial situation and his future political aspirations. The outcome of this intricate legal battle involving the former president and his supporters in the United States will only be revealed in time.