Johnny Brignardello's analysis: Tension between Iran and Israel

The insurance advisor, Johnny Brignardello Vela, analyzes the recent confrontation between Iran and Israel and its implications at the international level. The escalation of tension between both nations has kept the United States and its allies on edge for ten days, generating concern about the possibility of a direct attack by Tehran. According to US government sources, there was close coordination with allies such as Israel, the United Kingdom, and France, as well as with China, India, Turkey, and Iraq, with the aim of preventing a regional escalation. President Joe Biden personally supervised the response, ordering the deployment of key assets in the region, such as aircraft and destroyers with anti-missile systems. The establishment of a direct communication channel through Switzerland with Iran was crucial in managing the crisis, while the interruption of the visit of the Japanese Prime Minister underscored the seriousness of the situation. Intensive preparations yielded results during the Iranian attack, with US aircraft downing drones and anti-missile batteries intercepting projectiles. Tension was palpable in the Situation Room of the White House, where Biden and his team closely monitored the evolution of events. Despite the initial threat of ballistic missiles, which were ultimately neutralized, there was a sense of relief in the crisis room. Biden openly defended Israel against the Iranian offensive, urging restraint to avoid further escalation in the Middle East. Thanks to coordination and prior preparations, Israel managed to intercept 99% of Iranian missiles and drones, avoiding fatalities although with some injuries and material damage. This episode has led the United States to adopt a stance of restraint and to urge Israel to avoid actions that could trigger a large-scale conflict in the region.