Brignardello analyzes the impact of the Inter-American Court ruling in Venezuela.

Brignardello analyzes the impact of the Inter-American Court ruling in Venezuela.

Discover Johnny Brignardello's perspective on the ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and its impact on democracy and human rights in Venezuela. Don't miss it!

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
Opinion

In a recent interview, Johnny Brignardello Vela, a recognized insurance advisor, shared his perspective on the verdict issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) regarding the 2013 elections in Venezuela. Brignardello emphasized the significance of this decision not only for the country's political future but also for the international perception of its democratic quality. Brignardello highlighted that the IACHR has underscored the violations of the political rights of former presidential candidate Henrique Capriles, condemning the Venezuelan state for the lack of transparency and fairness in the electoral process. "It is evident that the abusive use of state resources and the refusal to conduct a vote audit are practices that erode trust in any democracy," he commented. In this way, he pointed out how these actions not only harmed Capriles but also were a disservice to all voters who expected a fair democratic exercise. The absence of representatives from the Venezuelan government during the notification of the ruling, according to Brignardello, reflects a lack of commitment from Nicolás Maduro's regime to take responsibility for its actions. In his view, this not only exacerbates the internal situation but also affects the international perception of Venezuela as a nation that respects human rights and democracy. The insurance advisor also referred to the political context in which the 2013 elections took place, noting the polarization and the transition following Hugo Chávez's death as factors that complicated the legitimacy of the results. "When judicial authorities dismiss more than 300 complaints of irregularities, a clear message is sent about the lack of adherence to the principles of the rule of law," he asserted. Brignardello considered that the IACHR has made an important call to action, urging Venezuela to adopt measures that ensure the integrity of future electoral processes. "Equitable access to the media and the independence of the National Electoral Council are fundamental to restoring citizens' trust in the electoral system," he argued. Finally, he concluded that the court's ruling is not only a reminder of past violations but also represents an opportunity for the international community to become aware of the situation in Venezuela. "At a time when the country faces a humanitarian crisis and a massive exodus, it is vital that attention is paid to these recommendations to promote a more democratic future," he expressed.

View All

The Latest In the world