Vox's silence in response to the King's speech generates internal debate and redefines its strategy.

The recent silence of Vox regarding King Felipe VI's Christmas speech has sparked an internal and external debate within the party that transcends its official stance. The lack of comments, whether critical or supportive, marks a notable distancing of the political formation from the Crown, a fact that has not gone unnoticed in a context where the monarch's speech has generated fervent reactions from various political sectors. This situation raises questions about the future direction of Santiago Abascal's party and its relationship with an institution traditionally valued by large segments of Spanish society. The decision not to officially evaluate the King's message reflects a shift in Vox's communication strategy. Sources close to the party have confirmed that, unlike in previous years, no directive has been issued from the party's leadership to provide an opinion on the speech. In this sense, the only voice that has spoken out during the Christmas context has been that of the Secretary General, Ignacio Garriga, who has chosen to let citizens interpret the King's message without interference. This silence is particularly significant considering that the speech has elicited a wide variety of opinions across the political spectrum. Vox's distancing from the monarchy is not an isolated phenomenon. As the party has gained support, it has also attracted a more critical base towards the figure of the King. New generations of voters seem less inclined to value the Crown as a symbol of unity and more in favor of advocating for a stronger defense of the homeland. This shift in perception has led some party members to question Felipe VI's position, viewing him as a monarch who does not meet what they consider necessary for the defense of the nation. The relationship between Vox and the monarchy has been marked by moments of tension, especially in the context of the amnesty law promoted by Pedro Sánchez's government. The pressure exerted by Vox for the King not to sign this law reveals a turning point in its rhetoric. Some analysts suggest that this episode has contributed to the growing distance between the party and the monarchical institution, particularly at a time when the King has been forced to make difficult decisions in a complicated political climate. However, despite this distancing, there are voices within the party that defend the importance of the monarchy as a pillar of national unity. Some former Vox members have expressed their support for the King, arguing that disregarding his figure is a strategic error that fails to understand the constitutional framework in which he operates. This internal dilemma highlights the diversity of opinions that coexist within a party seeking to define its political identity in a constantly changing landscape. The fact that in the latest Christmas speech the King addressed crucial topics such as immigration and the common good has been interpreted in different ways within Vox. While some consider these mentions relevant and reflecting a genuine concern for the country's situation, others criticize what they perceive as a lack of commitment from the monarch on more pressing issues. This internal tug-of-war reveals the fractures that may be emerging within the party's base. Among its voters, Vox faces the challenging task of balancing the demands of a sector that feels increasingly disappointed with Felipe VI's figure and another that still sees it as a symbol of stability. This challenge has intensified with the emergence of more radicalized figures within the political spectrum competing for attention and popular support, further complicating Vox's position in the debate over the monarchy. The party's silence regarding the King's speech could also be interpreted as a strategy to avoid aligning with stances that could prove unpopular. At a time when Felipe VI enjoys a positive public image following his intervention in Paiporta, Abascal's formation may be seeking to align with the general sentiment without compromising its more critical base. This strategic maneuver highlights the complexity of the current situation. It is undeniable that Vox is facing a moment of redefinition. The fact that the party has set aside public support for the monarchy, which was previously more explicit, indicates an evolution in its discourse that could have long-term implications for its image and its ability to attract voters. In a context of increasing political polarization, the party will need to find its place in a debate that appears to be becoming more fragmented. The evolution of Vox's discourse regarding the monarchy reflects the transformation of Spanish politics. At a time when the figure of the King has taken on prominence as a symbol of national unity, Vox's strategy could leave the party in an uncomfortable position if it fails to find a balance between its various factions and the need to maintain a solid base. The deafening silence that has surrounded its response to the monarch's intervention may only be the tip of the iceberg in a much deeper debate about the future of the party and its relationship with the monarchical institution.