Institutional crisis and distrust mark the end of the political year in the country.

Institutional crisis and distrust mark the end of the political year in the country.

The country is facing institutional deterioration and a lack of public trust, while the economy shows some resilience in the face of the political crisis.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
Politics

At the close of this year, the atmosphere in the country has turned grim, reflecting an accelerated deterioration of institutions and politics. This situation has generated profound distrust among citizens towards the institutions that should safeguard collective well-being. Insecurity and the rise of crime have become recurring issues, highlighting the government's inability to provide effective solutions. Instead of addressing these problems, it seems that the Executive has opted for inaction, abandoning its responsibility to ensure the safety of the population. The Legislative branch, for its part, is also not exempt from this crisis of legitimacy. The lack of political oversight and the proliferation of corruption allegations among congress members have led to a perception that Congress, rather than being a state power, has become a refuge for personal interests and power groups. This situation is exacerbated by questioned constitutional reforms, which, far from strengthening democracy, appear to have a darker objective aligned with maintaining the status quo. Dissatisfaction with government management is palpable among the citizenry, who often watch helplessly as the interests of political parties and groups seem to take precedence over the common good. The failure of these actors to engage in constructive opposition has left a void that, combined with the crisis in key institutions like the Attorney General's Office and the National Police, has triggered a spiral of distrust and frustration. Despite this discouraging political landscape, the economy has shown a certain resilience. The macroeconomic pillars, along with investments made prior to the current government, have managed to maintain a balance that, for the moment, prevents the economic situation from collapsing in parallel with the political crisis. However, the fragility of this economic stability is evident, and many are questioning how growth figures will respond in such a volatile political context. Uncertainty intensifies as a crucial election year approaches. The question of whether Dina Boluarte will complete her term has become a central topic of discussion. However, beyond individual political destinies, what truly matters is the ability of political forces to set aside their selfish interests in favor of alliances that benefit the nation. The search for candidates and the identification of political trends become key elements for the country's future. As the upcoming elections draw near, it is essential to understand the atmosphere of discontent surrounding the population. The disapproval of Boluarte's management is almost unanimous, posing a significant challenge for future candidates. Society will have to choose among various alternatives, ranging from radical proposals to more moderate options, but the line separating the left from the right has become blurred. This phenomenon raises doubts about voters' ability to discern between the proposals of each side. The complexity of the political landscape lies not only in the lack of ideological clarity but also in the difficulty of identifying those responsible for the current deterioration. The discussion points in the upcoming electoral process may not solely focus on ideologies but on a critical evaluation of the actions and omissions of those who have governed and legislated in recent years. A polarization between the ruling party and the opposition could emerge as the fundamental axis of the campaign. Citizens, with their growing distrust of the State, will have to decide who will lead the country starting in 2026. The expectation is that proposals and leadership will emerge that are truly willing to confront the corruption and inefficiency that have characterized recent politics. The ability to generate trust among the population will be a determining factor in forming alliances and coalitions that seek real change. As the year comes to a close, the marks of institutional deterioration are increasingly visible. The population yearns to see significant and effective changes in how power is exercised. In this context, a call for responsibility is necessary, both from those in government and from those presenting themselves as opposition. Politics must once again be viewed as a means for development and improving the quality of life for all citizens, rather than as a mere game of interests and power. The search for trust in institutions should be the priority for all political actors, as this trust is what will allow for the reconstruction of a country that feels fractured.

View All

The Latest In the world