Controversy in the U.S.: Hero and villain in crime and self-defense.

Controversy in the U.S.: Hero and villain in crime and self-defense.

The controversy in the U.S. between Luigi Mangione, seen as a hero by some, and Daniel Penny, considered a villain, reflects deep ideological divisions.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
World

In a surprising turn in the social and political narrative of the United States, an intense controversy has erupted that highlights the deep ideological divisions in the country. The case of Luigi Mangione, a young man accused of murdering Brian Thompson, an executive at United HealthCare, has sparked a wave of reactions from the left that have placed this suspect at the center of a moral debate. Meanwhile, Daniel Penny, a former Marine charged with involuntary manslaughter after trying to defend passengers in a subway car, has become the villain in this dual narrative. Mangione, coming from a wealthy family that allowed him to attend the University of Pennsylvania, is seen by some sectors of the left as a hero who took justice into his own hands by attacking a health insurance executive. Prominent figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have echoed a narrative that seeks to contextualize his actions as a response to the injustices of the healthcare system in the United States. In their statements, they have slipped in phrases that, while condemning the act of killing, seem to justify the motivations that led Mangione to commit the crime. On the other hand, the case of Daniel Penny, who was compelled to act in defense of a group of passengers feeling threatened by Jordan Neely, has been treated with a diametrically opposed approach. Penny, in an attempt to calm the situation, ended up restraining Neely, who later died on the way to the hospital. Despite the circumstances of the incident generating debates about the legality and morality of Penny's actions, the narrative that has emerged from the left has been relentless in its condemnation. The contrast could not be more evident: while Mangione is elevated to a near-martyr status in certain progressive circles, Penny is viewed as a villain, a white ex-Marine who, in the midst of a confrontation, made a decision that turned fatal. This phenomenon has led many to question the criteria that govern the consideration of heroes and villains in contemporary public discourse. A key aspect of this debate is the consideration of racial and socioeconomic identities in the evaluation of both cases. The left has focused on Neely's race, a Black man with a criminal history who, despite this, was released by authorities prior to the incident. This context has led some to attempt to turn Neely into a symbol of racial struggles in the United States, a narrative that has left little room to consider Penny's intentions. The position of New York prosecutors has also faced criticism. The decision to pursue a trial against Penny while ignoring the issues surrounding Neely highlights tensions within the justice system. Many wonder if the trial is an attempt to respond to a broader social outcry regarding racial justice and police violence, rather than a fair assessment of the facts. This case has also highlighted how narratives are constructed and sustained in the public sphere. The left, in trying to elevate Mangione as a hero fighting against an oppressive system, seems to overlook the human pain that accompanies his actions. Conversely, the right has seized on Penny's situation to point out what they see as hypocrisy in the left's response, arguing that true heroism lies in defensive and altruistic action. Meanwhile, public opinion is divided. Social media has witnessed heated debates, with thousands expressing their outrage and confusion at the apparent glorification of a murderer and the demonization of a man who, at the end of the day, tried to help. This phenomenon reflects a deeply polarized society, where political identities significantly influence perceptions of morality. In summary, what should be a discussion about the value of human lives and justice has been transformed into an ideological battle, where the left and right use these stories as weapons in a broader conflict. The narratives surrounding Mangione and Penny reveal not only the political divisions in the United States but also the complexity of human emotions and the decisions made in moments of crisis. The underlying lesson is that the labels of hero and villain are often more complicated than they seem, and it is vital for society to seek to understand the stories behind actions, rather than rushing to judgment.

View All

The Latest In the world