Trump warns that Harris's victory could threaten Israel's security.

In a recent public appearance, former President Donald Trump issued a strong warning about the future of Israel in the context of the upcoming U.S. presidential elections. Against the backdrop of increasing political polarization in the country, Trump stated that the victory of Vice President Kamala Harris would have catastrophic consequences for the Jewish state. His remarks have sparked significant debate about Israel's security and the role the United States plays in the region. During a campaign rally, Trump did not hold back on the drama, asserting: "If they win, Israel will disappear. Don’t forget that." Such statements, which aim to appeal to fear among his supporters, are a common strategy in the former president's rhetoric, who has used the issue of Middle Eastern security to solidify his support base. As a central figure in the Republican Party, his words have the potential to significantly impact public perception and voting decisions in the coming weeks. Trump's claims come amid a climate of rising tension in the Middle East, where the political and military situation is delicate. The relationship between the United States and Israel has historically been strong, but different administrations have had contrasting views on how to address challenges in the region. Trump’s warning reflects not only his personal stance but also a broader strategy to mobilize Republican voters at a crucial time. Kamala Harris, who is running as the Democratic candidate, has defended her support for Israel on several occasions. However, Trump’s narrative seeks to portray Harris and the Democratic Party as a threat to Israeli security, appealing to the perception that a change in administration could lead to a decrease in U.S. support for the Jewish state. This tactic is part of a broader discourse in which Republicans have tried to position themselves as the true defenders of Israel. The impact of the U.S. elections on international politics, and specifically in the Middle East, is a recurring topic in political debates and analyses. Trump's administration was known for its firmly pro-Israel stance, which included recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and cutting aid to the Palestinian Authority. These decisions were praised by many in the Jewish community but also generated criticism and tensions in the region. As the election date approaches, campaigns are intensifying, and rhetoric is becoming more polarized. Trump's claims may lead to a deeper discussion about the future of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on strategic allies like Israel. However, the use of extreme statements may also alienate some voters who seek a more conciliatory and less divisive approach. The former president has also seized the current situation to reinforce his image as a strong leader in contrast to an administration he considers weak or ineffective. In this sense, his rhetoric aims not only to mobilize his base but also to delegitimize Harris as a candidate. This strategy is common in electoral campaigns, where political rivals attempt to portray each other as incapable of managing crucial crises. Responses to Trump's claims have been varied. Some leaders and analysts have criticized his alarmism, suggesting that Israel's future depends on multiple factors, not just a single election in the United States. Others support his perspective, arguing that the current Democratic administration's policies could diminish support for Israel, thereby altering the balance in the region. Meanwhile, voters are preparing for an electoral process that promises to be one of the most contested in recent years. Trump's intervention in the debate about Israel could influence the decisions of many, especially in an electorate that has historically been committed to the Zionist cause. However, the challenge for the former president will be to convince a divided population fatigued by years of political and social conflicts. The future of the relationship between the United States and Israel, and of foreign policy in general, emerges as one of the key points in this election. Trump's warning about the supposed disappearance of Israel if Harris wins may be seen as a tactic to galvanize his supporters, but it also opens the door to a broader debate about the direction U.S. policy should take in the Middle East. In an increasingly interconnected world, the decisions made in November could have repercussions that extend far beyond U.S. borders.