"Trump's sentencing postponed until after the elections, reigniting the political debate."

The judge of the New York Supreme Court, Juan M. Merchan, has decided to postpone the sentencing in the criminal case facing former President Donald Trump until November 26, which is after the presidential elections scheduled for November 5. This move, seen as a victory for Trump’s legal team, has sparked extensive debate about the political and legal implications of a case that has captured national attention. In May, a jury found Trump guilty on 23 counts related to document falsification, a crime that emerged in the context of his attempt to silence porn actress Stormy Daniels, with whom he had an extramarital affair. The conviction could lead to up to four years in prison, although legal experts suggest that Judge Merchan may choose a more lenient sentence, possibly probation or periodic court visits. The request to delay the sentencing was made by Trump’s legal team, arguing that the trial and subsequent judicial decision could interfere with the electoral process. In such a polarized political climate, where Trump faces Democrat Kamala Harris in a contest that promises to be close, the postponement seems to benefit his political interests at a critical moment in his career. However, not everything has gone in Trump’s favor in recent days. Earlier this month, federal judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed a request from the former president to move his criminal case to federal court. Hellerstein argued that the payments made to Daniels are not related to the official acts of a president, further complicating Trump’s defense. Hellerstein’s rejection of the request to change jurisdiction was based on the premise that presidential immunity would not apply to this particular case. The decision reaffirms that Trump’s actions regarding the payment to Daniels are considered private and not part of his role as president. This ruling has generated a sense of frustration within Trump’s legal team, which has repeatedly pointed out what it perceives as bias in the judicial system. During a recent press appearance, Trump continued his attacks on the judicial system, stating that it is “rigged” and that his case is a victim of “political interference.” The former president emphasized that the trial in New York, a city with a strong Democratic lean, is a clear reflection of how politics can influence justice. His narrative of being a political target has become a key element of his electoral campaign. Judge Merchan’s decision to postpone sentencing raises questions about the transparency of the judicial process and its impact on politics. Some analysts suggest that the delay could provide Trump with the necessary time to appeal his conviction and prepare a more robust defense strategy, while others wonder if this situation could influence voter sentiment. With the elections approaching, the situation becomes increasingly confusing. For many, Trump’s case represents an intersection between justice and politics, where every legal move is interpreted through an electoral lens. The pressure on Merchan to handle this case carefully is palpable, as any decision could have repercussions not only for Trump but also for the public perception of judicial institutions in the United States. This event marks another chapter in Trump’s political saga, as he has managed to capitalize on his legal challenges to galvanize the loyalty of his supporters. Meanwhile, the rest of the country watches closely as events unfold, hoping that the final verdict will not only resolve Trump’s immediate future but also the political climate in the nation.