Trump intensifies his incendiary rhetoric in the electoral campaign and immigration policy.

In the midst of an increasingly polarized and tense electoral climate, Donald Trump has once again made strategic use of incendiary rhetoric, this time focusing on immigration policy and international relations. The former president of the United States has not held back in his disparagement of his Democratic opponents, whom he has called "stupid" following the recent seizure of a plane linked to Nicolás Maduro's regime in Venezuela. This statement adds to a series of criticisms that Trump has directed at the Biden administration, particularly regarding immigration and security. The confiscation of the plane, which is believed to be connected to drug trafficking and illicit activities, has garnered attention in both political and media circles. However, for Trump, this event has served as a springboard to reiterate his narrative that the current government's immigration policy is failing and that the Democrats are responsible for the insecurity that, according to him, Americans are facing. In his statements, Trump has maintained that many criminals who should be detained in their home countries are arriving in the U.S., which he argues exacerbates the problems of violence in the country. The former president has used these claims to bolster his candidacy in the upcoming elections on November 5, seeking to attract a voter base that is increasingly anxious about insecurity and immigration. As the elections approach, Trump's criticisms of Biden have intensified, reflecting not only his electoral strategy but also the current state of American politics, where divisions are becoming increasingly evident. During a recent interview with technology mogul Elon Musk, Trump even suggested that if the elections result in a "horror show," it might be safer to meet in Venezuela than in the United States. This insinuation has been met with astonishment by many, as it highlights how Trump is willing to use any event, however tragic, to consolidate his political message and mobilize his base. Additionally, Trump has maintained the argument that crime in Venezuela has decreased because criminals are moving to the United States, a comment that ignores the complex realities of the situation in both countries. His rhetoric is based on isolated cases that, while shocking, do not represent the entirety of the statistical reality. According to FBI data, violent crime in the U.S. has reached historically low levels in recent decades, a context that Trump seems to overlook in his quest for support. In this context, Democrats have responded to Trump's accusations by defending their approach to immigration policy and emphasizing the need for solutions that are not based on fear or misinformation. Several party officials have pointed out that the security of citizens is not achieved through rhetorical attacks, but through comprehensive policies that address the root causes of migration and crime. At the same time, the international condemnation of the "unjustified arrest warrant" for Maduro's electoral rival, Edmundo González, reflects a growing concern about the political situation in Venezuela and its impact on the region. Nine countries in Latin America have rejected this warrant, underscoring the need for a more collaborative and less confrontational approach to international relations, in contrast to Trump's vision. Political analysts warn that Trump's use of incendiary rhetoric may have repercussions on public perception regarding immigration and national security. However, there is also the question of whether this strategy will truly resonate with a voter base that is increasingly seeking practical and effective solutions to community problems. As the electoral campaign progresses, it seems evident that Trump's figure will continue to be polarizing. The obvious dichotomy between his proposals and the Democrats' responses promises to keep public opinion in a constant debate about the future of immigration policy and security in the United States, while international events unfold that could influence the electoral context. The upcoming contest will not only be played out at the polls, but also in the arena of ideas and in how citizens perceive and react to these narratives.