The Coayla proposal seeks to reform the electoral law amid political corruption.

The political landscape in the country is stirred by the recent legislative proposal presented by Congressman Jorge Coayla of the Juntos por el Perú - Voces del Pueblo party. This bill, numbered 8761/2024-CR, aims to amend Article 24-B of Law 28094, the Law of Political Organizations, allowing candidates who have not resigned from their political parties to run for office with other organizations in general, municipal, and regional elections. The initiative, which has sparked intense debate in political and social spheres, responds to a need to guarantee the right to be elected, as outlined in the justification for the proposal. The text argues that this modification is crucial for expanding citizens' options, reinforcing electoral competition conditions, and enabling more equitable participation in the democratic process. Coayla emphasizes that the current restriction, which forces candidates to resign from their party in order to present their candidacy with another organization, limits citizens' ability to exercise their political rights. By allowing affiliates to run without resigning, the aim is not only to expand the electoral choices but also to protect those who, due to circumstances beyond their control, cannot participate in their original parties' primaries. The proposal also delves into the discussion about transparency and equity within political parties, pointing out that existing alternatives, such as extending the deadlines for resignations and affiliations, do not adequately address the discrimination issues that may arise in the candidate selection process. In this regard, Coayla argues that his initiative is more effective and better responds to the current needs of the political system. On the other hand, the news does not solely revolve around Coayla's proposal. The prosecution has warned that a sector of Congress seems interested in "breaking" cases against criminal organizations, adding a concerning nuance to the context in which this debate unfolds. The faces of corruption and impunity have been prominent on the public agenda, and the fact that some legislators may be linked to these interests raises questions about the integrity of the political system. The interrelation between Coayla's proposal and the corruption situation in the country is unavoidable. While the modification of the law seeks to improve citizen participation, it is also essential for legislators to firmly position themselves against corruption and work to restore trust in institutions. The fight against organized crime and corruption networks must be a priority that is not overshadowed by attempts to reform the electoral system. The path to a fairer and more participatory democracy, in which citizens feel represented and heard, requires recognizing the inherent issues in the current electoral legislation. Coayla's proposal could be a step in the right direction, provided it is handled with the transparency and responsibility demanded by the public. Furthermore, it is essential that such initiatives do not become tools to protect those who have been at the center of scandals but instead promote genuine political renewal. The struggle for a more inclusive political system must go hand in hand with the demand for accountability and the highlighting of corrupt practices. In conclusion, the proposal presented by Congressman Coayla opens the door to a debate that is more relevant than ever. The possibility for affiliates to run without resigning from their parties could be a significant advance in terms of political rights, as long as the focus remains on the fight against corruption and the need for a more equitable political system. The public is watching closely, hoping that their representatives act for the common good and not in favor of private interests.