Vizcarra is confident in lifting his disqualification and resuming his political career.

Martín Vizcarra, former president of the Republic of Peru, has once again captured media attention following the recent pronouncement from the Judiciary, which confirmed his disqualification for ten years from holding public office. This measure, imposed in April 2021 by the Congress of the Republic, is due to his involvement in the scandal known as 'Vacunagate,' where he is accused of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine secretly and irregularly while the country was facing a severe health crisis. In a message shared through his account on the social network X, Vizcarra expressed confidence that his disqualification would be lifted, allowing him to run for president again in the 2026 elections. "Finally, after three years of patient waiting, the Judiciary finishes the process. Now it’s up to the Constitutional Tribunal and finally the pronouncement of the IACHR," he noted, referring to the Constitutional Tribunal and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which will evaluate his case. The former president did not hesitate to assert that his situation would be reversed, emphasizing that "the disqualifications will be lifted for the sake of justice." This statement has generated significant resonance in the political arena, where both his detractors and supporters are analyzing the implications of his claims. The disqualification was approved by an overwhelming majority in Congress, with 86 votes in favor and no opposition, highlighting the context of rejection towards his administration. Public opinion has been diverse, with some sectors defending his right to participate in the electoral process, while others believe that his disqualification reflects an act of corruption that should not be overlooked. Vizcarra's confidence in the lifting of his disqualification is based on his conviction that his fundamental rights have been violated, including his right to participate in the political life of the nation. It is important to remember that previous judicial decisions have been unfavorable for the former president. Recently, the First Constitutional Chamber of Lima dismissed the amparo lawsuit filed by his defense, arguing that the resolution of the Sixth Constitutional Court was correct. This situation has led Vizcarra to appeal, seeking a change in the direction of his case. The shadow of 'Vacunagate' remains a hot topic in the Peruvian political debate, where the scandal has had significant repercussions on public perception of the political class and the management of the health crisis. Vizcarra's disqualification, along with other ongoing investigations into various political leaders, has generated a climate of distrust towards institutions and their representatives. Vizcarra's political future will depend not only on the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal and the IACHR but also on the response of the electorate, which has become increasingly critical and demanding regarding ethics and transparency in politics. As the 2026 elections approach, the landscape becomes more complex, and Vizcarra's actions will be closely monitored. Some analysts believe that his return to the political scene could reactivate old divisions in the country, while others think it could be an attempt to consolidate his legacy and redeem himself before an electorate that, while having supported him in the past, has witnessed the controversies of his administration. The communication strategy and legal steps he takes in the coming months will be crucial in determining whether he will regain his space in Peruvian politics. Meanwhile, reactions to his pronouncement and aspirations have multiplied on social media and in the media. The polarization in Peruvian society is evident, and Martín Vizcarra's case remains a reference point to discuss issues of ethics, responsibility, and the future of democracy in the country. Thus, the former president continues to be in the eye of the storm, fighting not only for his political future but also for his public reputation.