Insecurity in Peru: high perception and a crisis-ridden ministerial cabinet

The perception of insecurity in Peru has become a hot topic today, reflecting a troubling paradox. According to recent data provided by INEI, although only 27% of Peruvians have experienced a crime in the past year, an overwhelming 86% of the population feels unsafe. This contrast between actual victimization and the perception of insecurity raises profound questions about trust in authorities and the effectiveness of public security policies. The recent escalation in the perception of insecurity cannot be ignored by the Cabinet, which is under pressure from a tense social environment. Since the message on July 28, uncertainty has permeated the ministerial halls, fueled by rumors of mergers in the ministries that have left many ministers in a constant state of instability. Without a clear project supporting these mergers, the lack of information has contributed to a climate of anxiety in which ministers feel like pieces of a constantly shifting puzzle, with changes that could come at any moment. The mergers of ministries, a project that could have been conceived to optimize resources, have generated expectations that have yet to materialize. The complexity of this process has become a topic of debate, dividing opinions between those who advocate for the creation of a Ministry of Infrastructure and those who call for the elimination of ministries deemed unnecessary. The merger, far from being a simple solution, has transformed into a battleground between different political and sectoral ideologies, where any misstep could trigger a greater crisis. Meanwhile, ministers continue to grapple with the challenge of pleasing a variety of interest groups. The appointment of certain ministers has been met with applause in specific sectors, as is the case with Rómulo Mucho in Energy and Mines, who has managed to win the favor of the mining community. However, this dynamic has also created an atmosphere of distrust, where ministers are forced to act under the shadow of external expectations, complicating their ability to make bold and effective decisions. In contrast, some sectors, such as Women and Culture, face intense ideological controversy that puts their ministers on shaky ground. The insecurity of these figures in the cabinet is palpable, as they must navigate a minefield of criticism and contradictory expectations, which in turn reinforces the general perception of insecurity in the government. This phenomenon suggests that ministerial instability is not merely a matter of personnel changes, but a reflection of the lack of consensus around fundamental issues affecting the country. The situation is further complicated when considering the role of the Ministry of Economy and Finance, led by José Arista, who finds himself at the center of a storm of criticism over his fiscal management. Pressure from both the left and the right is intensifying, putting his position at risk. This tense environment not only affects his ability to manage economic policies but also has repercussions for the overall trust in the government. Despite the uncertainty surrounding the cabinet and security management, some ministers seem to have found ways to adapt. Figures like Eduardo Arana, the Minister of Justice, have taken a low profile, seeking to avoid conflicts while striving to maintain stability. However, this approach may prove counterproductive in the long run if it does not translate into concrete actions that address insecurity and public distrust. On their part, the lack of a clear plan regarding ministerial restructuring has left many in limbo. Although technical working groups have been established to assess the reorganization of the state apparatus, there is no clarity on the mergers that will take place. This lack of direction is reflected in the discontent of sectors that expect substantial changes, which could lead to an increase in political and social tensions. Fernando Vivas's chronicle highlights a complex reality at the heart of contemporary Peru. The perception of insecurity, fueled by cabinet instability and a lack of trust in institutions, poses significant challenges for Dina Boluarte's administration. The need for clear and effective leadership has become more urgent than ever, and the success or failure of this government will largely depend on its ability to address these issues comprehensively and effectively. With uncertainty looming and ministers in a constant struggle to maintain their position and relevance, the future of the cabinet presents itself as a complicated puzzle. The need to make decisions that not only satisfy interest groups but also address citizens' concerns is a monumental task facing the government as a whole. Meanwhile, Peruvians continue to live with the unease of an environment that, while it may not be as dangerous as it seems, is laden with a palpable fear that requires urgent attention.