Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
The situation of Petroperú, the emblematic state-owned company responsible for the production and distribution of oil in the country, has become a crucial point of discussion in Peruvian economic policy. In this context, the Society of Foreign Trade of Peru (ComexPerú) has issued a statement expressing concern about the direction the Government should take in light of the crisis facing the oil company. This call comes amid an uncertain landscape, where decisions made in the coming days could define the future of Petroperú and, consequently, the economic well-being of thousands of Peruvians. The board of Petroperú has indicated that the company's current management is unsustainable, a statement that reinforces the urgent need for the Government to take action. According to ComexPerú, financial problems and poor management from the past have led the company to a critical situation, where losses have become recurrent and requests for state bailouts have become constant. This situation not only affects the viability of the company but also implies an inefficient use of public resources. ComexPerú's statement highlights that the funds allocated to rescue Petroperú should be redirected towards projects that benefit the population. This assertion underscores one of the sharpest criticisms facing the current management: the perception that state resources are poorly managed and that, instead of being invested in infrastructure and social development, they are absorbed by a company that fails to reverse its financial situation. This reality raises questions about the Government's ability to adequately manage public assets. Furthermore, ComexPerú's support for the requests from the Petroperú board emphasizes the urgency of making decisions that align with the general interest, rather than favoring a few who have benefited from irregularities in the company's management. The reference to the president's national address, which promised a focus on transparency and accountability, becomes a call to action that many hope will be fulfilled soon. The situation of Petroperú is not just an economic issue; it is also a matter of public trust. The company's inability to stay afloat has undermined the credibility of the State in its role as regulator and administrator of national wealth. The lack of clarity regarding future decisions creates an environment of uncertainty that affects not only the company's workers but also the oil industry as a whole. ComexPerú has raised its concerns at a time when the country faces multiple economic challenges, and the management of state-owned enterprises has become a hot topic. Public opinion is closely watching the Government's response to this challenge, hoping for measures that not only address the crisis of Petroperú but also set a precedent for the future management of other state entities. In fact, ComexPerú's call is not just a demand regarding the situation of Petroperú, but also an invitation to reflect on the public management model in the country. Efficiency, transparency, and accountability are principles that should guide governmental decisions, especially in a context where resources are limited and the needs of the population are pressing. The Government's response to this crisis will be crucial not only for Petroperú but also for public trust in institutions and their ability to manage resources effectively. Civil society, as well as business sectors, are on alert, waiting for actions that not only ensure the sustainability of the state-owned company but also promote the economic development of the country as a whole. Ultimately, the future of Petroperú could reflect the broader future of Peru. The history of state management in the country is full of ups and downs, and the Government's current ability to handle this crisis could lay the groundwork for positive change or, conversely, for greater distrust in public administration. The pressure on the Executive is palpable, and time is running out to make decisions that could define the course of the energy sector and the Peruvian economy in the years to come.