Political crisis in France: Macron seeks stability amid social unrest.

French President Emmanuel Macron has resumed a complex process of consultations for the formation of a new government, after rejecting the proposal of Lucie Castets, the candidate from the left-wing coalition, to take the position of Prime Minister. This decision, justified in the name of "institutional stability," has heightened political tensions in a country that continues to grapple with the consequences of a recent and surprising electoral outcome. The legislative elections held in June and July produced an unprecedented landscape in the National Assembly, where the left-wing New Popular Front (NFP) emerged as the group with the most seats, holding 193 deputies, although falling short of an absolute majority. They are followed by Macron's alliance, which has 166 representatives, and the far-right National Rally (RN) with 142. This fragmentation has left France in a state of political paralysis, with a government that struggles to consolidate its authority. Macron has moved the scheduled legislative elections from 2027 to mid-next year, in an attempt to seek "clarification" from voters, especially after the rise of the far-right in the European elections. However, this maneuver seems to have led to a stalemate, rather than facilitating governance. The decision to keep Gabriel Attal as Prime Minister amid uncertainty and just months before the Olympic Games in Paris is indicative of the delicate situation. The new cycle of consultations, initiated by Macron on Tuesday, does not include the radical left parties or the far right, signaling a clear intention to avoid alliances that could compromise his agenda. In a statement, the head of state emphasized that a government based solely on the NFP's program would be "immediately censured" in the Assembly, highlighting the complexity of the current political landscape. Despite attempts at dialogue, NFP leaders have openly criticized the president's "serious inaction" and stated that the leading coalition should be in a position to form a government. In a letter addressed to the public, they stressed the importance of an effective response to the current political situation. However, Macron's refusal to consider Castets has made it clear that his strategy focuses on avoiding a left-wing government. Reactions among leftist parties have been strong. The head of the Green Party expressed her indignation, stating that the electoral outcome is being "stolen." The perception that Macron seeks to maintain control rather than seek solutions has fueled discontent and frustration within the opposition. Olivier Faure of the Socialist Party has described the situation as a "parody of democracy," reflecting the growing distrust toward the president. The situation has become even tenser with the call for a massive protest by La France Insoumise, scheduled for September 7. The demonstration is a clear indication of popular discontent and the increasing pressure on a government that seems unable to act decisively in a context of political polarization. As consultations unfold, the prospects for a coalition government remain uncertain. The fragmentation of Parliament has left Macron in a precarious position, where he will depend on a delicate balance between the moderate factions of the left and the power dynamics on the right. Any attempt to form an alliance that excludes LFI could result in an even greater confrontation and increased social discontent. Opposition political leaders have made it clear that they are unwilling to yield on their demands, and the lack of a clear consensus exacerbates existing tensions. Macron's consultation, which should be a step toward stability, could turn into a battleground where each party tries to impose its agenda, while time continues to run toward the Olympic Games. France thus faces a dilemma: Will Macron be able to find a path toward effective governance amid this complex political situation, or will he be dragged into a cycle of crisis and discontent that could have repercussions beyond his term? The answer could determine not only the immediate course of the country but also its long-term stability in an increasingly polarized European context.