JD Vance promises to reverse Biden's immigration policies in pursuit of border control.

In a recent interview with NBC News, JD Vance, the Republican candidate for the vice presidency of the United States, expressed his strong intention to reverse the immigration policies implemented by the Biden administration. He stated that the key to controlling the illegal immigration crisis lies in undoing the actions taken by Vice President Kamala Harris since the beginning of her term. Vance's remarks, which have reignited the debate on immigration policy in the country, focus on the need to reinstate deportations and curb asylum policies. During the interview, Vance emphasized that "if you want to take control of the illegal immigration problem, you must stop the bleeding." This approach, in the opinion of the Ohio senator, requires reversing policies that he claims have facilitated the arrival and presence of undocumented immigrants in the country. In this regard, Vance criticized "catch and release" and mass parole, arguing that these practices have significantly contributed to the current crisis. Despite pressures regarding his stance, Vance did not directly address the possibility that his approach might represent a new round of family separations, a sensitive topic that has drawn criticism in the past. Instead, he emphasized that any deportation campaign should begin with the most violent criminals, suggesting that federal resources should be focused on those individuals who pose a threat to society. The candidate also slammed the policies of the Biden administration, claiming that they have placed immigrant children in dangerous situations, living with drug or sex traffickers. Vance advocated for returning these minors to their families, a position that resonates with a voter base increasingly concerned about stories of abuse and exploitation at the border. Additionally, the senator hinted that the Department of Homeland Security is underestimating the number of irregular immigrants, suggesting that the Democratic administration has changed the way people enter the country, distorting statistics on border crossings. He claimed that crossings have decreased not due to the effectiveness of current policies, but because they are being redirected to ports of entry, a strategy he openly criticized. Vance did not limit himself to immigration policy; he also defended Donald Trump's protectionist economic stance, arguing that the lack of tariffs on products made in China will harm Americans in the long term. In this context, the Republican candidate positions himself not only as a defender of national security but also as a guardian of American economic interests. On another note, Vance commented on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s support for Trump, interpreting this backing as a sign that the Republican Party is functioning as an "umbrella party" that brings together diverse streams of thought. However, he expressed disagreement with some of Kennedy's positions, particularly on issues related to conspiracy theories. Vance's interview takes place in a tense political climate, where divisions over immigration policy are evident. Proposals for tightening immigration control generate both fervent support and severe criticism. The electorate's response to these statements could be decisive for Vance's political future and that of his running mate. On the international front, the situation in Venezuela remains a hot topic, and Vance seized the opportunity to criticize regional leaders. He mentioned that the policies of the Biden administration have left many countries in Latin America in a state of instability, which, in his opinion, exacerbates the migration crisis. This narrative fits within the broader Republican strategy of associating uncontrolled immigration with the ineffectiveness of Democratic governments. Meanwhile, the context of global politics is further complicated by the arrest of Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, in France. This event could influence public perception regarding security and privacy, issues that are increasingly interconnected with discussions about immigration and domestic policy. The combination of these topics highlights the complexity of the immigration debate in the United States, where policies, security, and the economy are intricately intertwined. As the election campaign progresses, Vance's proposals and his vision for the future of immigration policy will continue to be subject to intense scrutiny and discussion.