Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In a surprising turn of tone, Donald Trump delivered a speech at his Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey that seemed intentionally crafted to showcase a shift from his customary rhetoric. Framed by commonplace grocery items such as breakfast oats, bread, butter, and notably, pork sausage, the former president appeared to aim for a more relatable and policy-focused presentation. Gone were the days of unfiltered personal attacks; instead, Trump opted for a 45-minute, pre-prepared address, highlighting price increases in everyday goods under the current administration, asserting that flour has risen by 38% and eggs by 46%. While he did not entirely abandon his trademark style, as he continued to question the patriotism of Vice President Kamala Harris and branded her a "communist," the overall tone of the speech marked a noticeable departure from his previous, more confrontational approaches. This shift may resonate positively within Republican circles, where there have been growing concerns about Trump's ability to effectively counter Harris, who has emerged as the presumptive Democratic nominee. Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s former campaign manager, articulated a belief that the path to success for the former president was increasingly clear: "fewer insults, more insights, and that policy contrast." This sentiment reflects a yearning among some Republican leaders for a more substantive campaign strategy that avoids unnecessary distractions and focuses on core issues. Trump's recent missteps, including racially charged comments and dubious assertions regarding the integrity of his political opponents, have drawn criticism from fellow conservatives. Commentator Megyn Kelly labeled one such accusation about Harris’s crowd sizes as "so stupid," suggesting that Trump might benefit from redirecting his focus to pressing issues like border security. However, despite promising to base his remarks on "big facts and very substantial truths," Trump’s speech continued to blur the lines of factual accuracy. He reiterated unsubstantiated claims that the U.S. is being inundated with criminals and the mentally ill due to lax immigration policies, despite a lack of evidence supporting these assertions. Additionally, he maintained that all new job growth has favored migrants, a statement that contradicts available government data while also revisiting the debunked claims of winning the 2020 election. In this evolving political landscape, Trump’s attempt to engage with policy more deeply may reflect both self-awareness and strategic recalibration as he prepares for the challenges ahead. Whether this new approach will resonate with the electorate and successfully counter the narrative set by the Biden administration remains to be seen. The coming months will likely reveal whether this different kind of Trump will be effective in reclaiming his political standing.