Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
In a recent intervention, former President Donald Trump defended his approach to world leaders such as Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, and Xi Jinping, arguing that maintaining cordial relationships with these leaders is beneficial for the United States. During an event where he addressed his supporters, Trump emphasized the importance of establishing an understanding with leaders who, in his view, are "tough" and "smart." Trump, who is known for his direct and often controversial style, expressed his satisfaction at having had the opportunity to meet these leaders. "I know each one of them. And let me tell you, people will say 'Oh, this is terrible.' I'm not saying anything good or bad. They are at the top of their game," he commented, stressing that his experience with these leaders allowed him to better understand their national motivations. According to him, the love they have for their countries, although different from the American concept, is real and drives them to protect their interests. The former president also emphasized that following the change of administration in 2021, the United States has seen a deterioration in its international standing. "Our country is in very bad shape right now. It’s such a different place," lamented Trump, alluding to the perception of respect that the United States supposedly enjoyed under his leadership. According to his narrative, this respect translated into geopolitical decisions that benefited the country, such as countries like China agreeing not to buy oil in response to his statements. In this context, Trump did not hesitate to mention that had he remained in power, he believes "there would not have been attacks on Israel." This statement fits into his usual rhetoric of presenting his administration as a period of stability and security, contrasting it with what he considers the ineffectiveness of the current Democratic administration. This argument resonates with a significant part of his support base, which values his "America First" approach. As the electoral contest approaches, Trump faces renewed competition, especially from figures like Kamala Harris, who has demonstrated impressive fundraising and mobilization capabilities. The dynamics of the 2024 presidential race are shaping up to be complex, and Trump's ability to consolidate his base may depend on how he manages his image in relation to these foreign leaders. On the other hand, public opinion has been divided over the legitimacy of the relationships Trump has forged with authoritarian leaders. Some critics argue that this approach may undermine democratic values and human rights, while others maintain that pragmatic diplomacy is essential in an interconnected world. This debate intensifies as voters assess what type of leadership they prefer for the future. The former president has also used his comments about these leaders to criticize the current policies of the Biden administration, suggesting that the lack of a firm stance has led to a vacuum that could be exploited by adversarial nations. In his rhetoric, Trump presents his experience and knowledge of international politics as an essential asset that distinguishes him from his opponents. Against the backdrop of a recovering economy and persistent geopolitical challenges, Trump's strategy for 2024 will undoubtedly focus on his ability to connect with the electorate. His approach to international relations will be a recurring theme that could define not only his campaign but also the direction of the Republican Party in the coming years. Meanwhile, the political landscape continues to evolve, and Trump's ability to capitalize on his connections with world leaders will be closely watched by analysts and voters alike. Ultimately, the question that remains is whether his approach to controversial figures will be seen as a strength or a weakness in the electoral arena.