Peruvian Olympic successes: individual triumphs in a deficient system

Amid the euphoria and pride generated by the sports achievements of Peruvians at the Paris 2024 Olympics, a criticism arises that cannot be overlooked: the scant support from the state for its athletes. While the success of these sportspeople is a reason for celebration, it is essential to reflect on the conditions under which they achieve their goals and the limitations they face. The case of Stefano Peschiera, who emerged as a medalist, is emblematic. Although he achieved a great result, his story also reveals that he had to cover part of his expenses. This situation is not unique, as other athletes like Alonso Correa and Mary Luz Andía have also expressed the difficulties they encounter due to the lack of adequate financial support from their federations and the Peruvian Institute of Sports (IPD). Mary Luz Andía, who finished twelfth in her competition, emphasized that her achievement was reached "despite not having the support of the IPD." Such statements serve as a wake-up call regarding the need for a more robust system that supports athletes throughout their careers, not just in the lead-up to Olympic events, but as part of a sustained plan that allows them to develop their potential. On the other hand, the testimony of Kimberly García, a beneficiary of the Paris 2024 program from the IPD, also highlights the disparity in support that athletes receive. Although she has been backed, the lack of economic stability remains an obstacle; a situation that should be a priority for authorities if they genuinely wish to enhance sports at the national level. Surfer Alonso Correa also faces a similar dilemma, as his federation was unable to cover the cost of the surfboards necessary for his training. These examples indicate that, although some athletes receive some form of support, there are others who are simply left unprotected, limiting their ability to compete on equal terms. The triumphs of these athletes, then, are not merely a reflection of their individual effort but also of a structure that needs reform. The reality is that the successes achieved in Paris are personal victories and not a collective victory for Peru. It is clear that the lack of comprehensive and sustained support for sports in the country is a factor that cannot be ignored. The sense of pride that many Peruvians feel in response to the achievements of their compatriots is genuine, but it should not mask the deficiencies in the national sports system. Peschiera's victory is a reason for joy, but it is also an opportunity to demand change and a more ambitious investment in Peruvian sports, enabling athletes to compete under the best conditions. It is crucial that the state takes responsibility and designs an appropriate plan for each discipline, which includes not only financial support but also training and the necessary infrastructure for athletes to fully develop their skills. Without this, each triumph will continue to be a reflection of individual tenacity rather than a collective achievement. Ultimately, the celebration of victories in Paris should be accompanied by a critical reflection on how athletes are supported in Peru. We commend Stefano Peschiera and all those who have upheld the name of the country, but we must not forget that their success is, to a great extent, a triumph amid the adversity they face. The responsibility to improve this situation lies with all of us, especially those who have the power to implement meaningful changes in the realm of national sports.