Political crisis in Peru: polarization, scandals, and an uncertain future in elections.

The political situation in Peru has become a constant topic of debate, especially as new controversies and legal demands emerge that shape the daily agenda. While international attention has shifted towards other fronts, such as the crisis in Venezuela, Peruvians are facing a new cycle of internal conflicts that reflect the polarization of our political landscape. The recent request for preventive detention for President Dina Boluarte has captured the attention of many, but it is not the only hot topic being discussed. Amid all this, the scandal regarding the lifetime pension for Alberto Fujimori has resurfaced, generating a torrent of criticism and questions about the legality and ethics of such decisions. The question many are asking is: why does Congress choose to rekindle such a delicate issue that could exacerbate the already intense anti-Fujimori sentiment prevailing in the country? This decision has been seen by many analysts as an attempt by the dominant parties, Fuerza Popular and Alianza para el Progreso, to mutually benefit from one another, though it could prove counterproductive in the long run. It cannot be ignored that current political decisions not only affect the image of the parties involved but will also have a significant impact on the upcoming elections. The public perception that Congress is willing to do "favors" for historically questioned figures like Fujimori could lead to widespread repudiation, creating an easy target for political rivals. In fact, the closeness of these parties to Boluarte's government could become a double-edged sword, as many voters might interpret this relationship as a betrayal of democratic principles. On the other hand, the recent victory of a Peruvian athlete at the Olympics, who was criticized for his socioeconomic background and political stance, serves as a reminder that politics and sports in Peru often intertwine in unexpected ways. This situation reveals a broader phenomenon: the tendency to question compatriots who achieve success, which only reinforces the idea that rivalry among Peruvians is an obstacle to collective progress. As conflicts unfold in Congress, political struggles have escalated on different fronts. The internal battle between Fujimoristas and anti-Fujimoristas, and the tension between the right and the left, has intensified. This is manifested in legislative decisions that, instead of seeking consensus, seem designed to exacerbate divisions and further polarize the population. The approval of controversial laws and preferential treatment for certain sectors are examples of how politics can be distorted for the benefit of particular interests. The strategic errors made by Fuerza Popular and Alianza para el Progreso are alarming. The closeness of both groups to the current government can be interpreted as an attempt to consolidate power, but it could also result in irreversible damage to their image. Their participation in the Congressional Board and their response to public demands can be viewed as an attempt to politically capitalize, although the consequences could be fatal in such a volatile electoral context. The lack of clarity and ambiguity in the decisions being made in Congress reflect a deep disillusionment among voters. The perception that political parties prioritize their interests over the general welfare is a sentiment that has taken root in the collective consciousness. As a result, a breeding ground is created for those who present themselves as true opponents, ready to capitalize on the frustration of the citizenry. Meanwhile, public pressure and expert opinion continue to grow regarding the legality of the pension for Fujimori. Legal experts and analysts have spoken out against it, adding another layer of complexity to the discussion. The stance of the government and Congress on this matter will be closely monitored, as any misstep could trigger a new wave of popular discontent. Looking ahead to the upcoming elections, the scenario is uncertain. The growing polarization and controversial decisions made by traditional parties could open the door to new contenders promising change. The ability of established parties to manage their image and their relationship with the government will be crucial in this context. In a country where political disillusionment is palpable, voters are increasingly inclined to seek alternatives that break with the status quo. In conclusion, Peruvian politics faces a critical moment. The combination of scandals, controversial decisions, and an increasingly critical citizenry could drastically change the electoral landscape. As we enter this new cycle, it is essential for parties to reflect on their role and consider the repercussions of their actions. In an environment where public perception can be the difference between success and failure, the ability to listen and respond to citizens' concerns becomes an unavoidable imperative.