"Rosales calls for political maturity amid tensions following elections in Venezuela."

The anti-Chavista governor of Zulia, Manuel Rosales, has called for "political maturity" in the context of the recent elections in Venezuela, where the government has declared its victory. In a message published on the X platform, Rosales emphasized that the country is facing "decisive hours" and that it is crucial to act firmly to defend the results of July 28. This statement comes amid a climate of political tension, where the opposition questions the legitimacy of Nicolás Maduro's victory, who, according to the National Electoral Council (CNE), obtained 51.95% of the votes, while his opponent, Edmundo González Urrutia, reached 43.18%. Rosales underlined the importance of maintaining a responsible and peaceful approach to resolve the controversies that have arisen following the electoral process. He emphasized that the work of the opposition, grouped in the Democratic Unitary Platform (PUD), continues to aim for a solution that respects the will of the Venezuelan people. This approach contrasts with the recurrent accusations of fraud and manipulation in the opposition's discourse, creating an atmosphere of distrust towards the country's electoral institutions. Tension intensifies with statements from María Corina Machado, a prominent figure in the opposition, who has insisted that the available voting witness records support her claim that González Urrutia is the true elected president. She pointed out that in over 80% of the electoral tables, the results indicate a victory in her favor. This assertion has resonated not only nationally but also internationally, with several countries, such as the United States, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Panama, and Costa Rica, aligning with her interpretation of the events. The position of Rosales and the PUD is further complicated by the recent history of elections in Venezuela, where the credibility of the CNE has been called into question. Allegations of irregularities and electoral manipulation are persistent echoes in the country’s collective memory. In this sense, the demand for "political maturity" could be interpreted as a call for unity within the opposition, seeking to avoid fragmentation at a key moment for the country's future. Amid this context, the international community is watching closely. The reactions from the aforementioned countries, which have recognized the result in favor of González Urrutia, add a diplomatic component that could influence internal decisions. External pressure could be a determining factor in the unfolding of events, as international support or condemnation can impact both the legitimacy of a government and the opposition's ability to organize and mobilize. Meanwhile, the CNE has maintained its stance by reaffirming the announced results, which poses a clear challenge to the opposition seeking to question the accuracy of those numbers. The release of 96.87% of the scrutinized records is still pending, fueling speculation and calls for transparency. This delay in disclosing key information could be interpreted as a lack of willingness to open a broader debate about the legitimacy of the electoral process. Venezuela's immediate future appears to be marked by a play of political tensions and the need for dialogue. Rosales has called for peace and the search for constitutional solutions, but the reality is that polarization and doubts about the legitimacy of the election could hinder consensus-building. The country's recent history has shown that, in times of crisis, a lack of trust and distrust between parties can lead to further stagnation. Defending the electoral results and seeking a peaceful solution present a monumental task. The deep divisions in Venezuelan society require leadership that can transcend the current polarization. However, the statements from Rosales and other opposition leaders suggest that the struggle for democracy and justice in Venezuela is far from over. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan people remain trapped in a cycle of unfulfilled promises and frustrated expectations. The citizens' willingness to participate in the electoral process and demand their rights remains a beacon of hope. However, the key to the country's future lies in the ability of its leaders to find common ground that allows not only for the defense of electoral results but also for the construction of a better future for all.