"Attack on Patricia Chirinos: a call to reject political intolerance"

The recent aggression against Congresswoman Patricia Chirinos at a venue in Barranco has sparked a wave of condemnation from various sectors of society. The incident, in which a group of people harassed the parliamentarian while she was in an entertainment space, highlights the growing political intolerance that threatens democratic coexistence in the country. Chirinos, who represents the Avanza País party, was not only subjected to insults but also suffered a physical attack when a glass was thrown at her, along with her colleague, Congressman Luis Aragón. This episode serves as a clear reminder that, regardless of political differences, harassment and violence have no place in a society that claims to be democratic. The attack on Chirinos is a symptom of a broader problem: the lack of respect for those with differing viewpoints. For democracy to function properly, it requires an environment of tolerance, where disagreements are resolved within the framework of political debate and not through intimidation and fear. Recent events lead us to question to what extent we are willing to allow violence to become a method of political expression. There are established channels for expressing disagreement, whether through debates, peaceful protests, or even through the exercise of voting. Violence only delegitimizes struggles and generates a cycle of retaliation that can quickly escalate into uncontrollable situations. Democracy should not be seen as a battlefield but as a space for constructive dialogue. The situation becomes even more complicated when political figures, such as former minister Mirtha Vásquez, suggest that harassment can be a valid form of "moral sanction." Such statements not only trivialize the severity of the attacks but can also empower those who believe that violence is an acceptable means of expressing discontent. The legitimization of violence and harassment, even in the name of a political cause, is a slippery slope that can lead to disastrous consequences. It is important to remember that history is full of examples of how harassment and violence have been used to silence dissenting voices. In this regard, other politicians have been victims of similar attacks in the past, such as Carlos Tubino, Ricardo Burga, and Luis Alva Castro. These episodes of political violence are not isolated; they are part of a pattern of aggression aimed at delegitimizing and intimidating opponents. The consequences of normalizing this type of behavior are devastating. An environment in which violence is considered a valid response only serves to perpetuate a cycle of hatred and division. As we approach the upcoming elections, it is crucial for political leaders and society as a whole to reflect on the importance of respecting those with whom we disagree. Politics should not be a battlefield but a space where ideas and proposals can be discussed with respect. In this context, the responsibility falls on all of us, not just on politicians. As citizens, we must be critical not only of our leaders' actions but also of our own behaviors. The way we respond to disagreement has implications for the health of our democracy. Violence only breeds more violence, and the only way forward is through dialogue and mutual understanding. Defending democracy requires a constant commitment to the principles of respect and tolerance. Violence and harassment only undermine those foundations and create a climate of fear that can paralyze society. It is imperative that everyone, from political leaders to ordinary citizens, work together to reject any form of political violence and foster a culture of dialogue and respect. Finally, the aggression suffered by Patricia Chirinos should serve as a wake-up call for all of us. We cannot allow intolerance and violence to become the norm. We must raise our voices against these acts, reaffirming our commitment to a democracy in which respect and dialogue are the fundamental pillars. Politics should be a space where all voices are heard, not where those who think differently are silenced.