Controversy over lifetime pension for Fujimori reignites criticism and distrust in Peru.

The decision by the Congress of the Republic of Peru to approve a lifelong pension for former President Alberto Fujimori has sparked a wave of questions and accusations regarding the political motivations behind this measure. Despite his removal from office in 2001 and his resignation from Japan amidst corruption scandals, letter 1018-2024, dated July 10, 2024, has authorized this controversial benefit. The news has not only reignited the debate over Fujimori's legacy but has also prompted an examination of the relationship between certain political actors and the Alianza para el Progreso (APP) party, led by regional governor César Acuña. According to a report from the program Cuarto Poder, connections have been pointed out between the approval of the pension and individuals close to APP. Among them is Haidy Janette Figueroa Valdéz, the current head of the human resources department of Congress. Figueroa, who has been a party member since 2014, has denied any ties to APP, which has raised further suspicions about the process that led to this legislative decision. Another name that has emerged in this context is lawyer José Rubio Preciado, who was responsible for advocating the approval of the lifelong pension. His brief tenure in Congress, lasting only a few months, has faced criticism, particularly because his hiring coincided with the process that ultimately approved Fujimori's request. Doubts about his suitability and the reasons behind his selection are evident, considering he is known for his connections with APP. The case becomes even more intriguing when considering that Rubio Preciado was removed from his position just ten days after presenting his argument in favor of the pension. His short time in office and the salary of more than S/ 19,000 he received have left many questioning the transparency and legitimacy of the decision made by Congress. Fujimori's lawyer, Elio Riera, has defended the legality of the pension, arguing that the law allows former presidents to have administrative staff and other benefits, such as security and gas vouchers. Riera has stated that, since the law permits it, they believe they have the right to request what is legally due. However, the justification for a lifelong pension for a former president who left office amid a political crisis and with multiple corruption allegations has provoked outrage from various sectors of Peruvian society. Many citizens view this measure as an attempt to legitimize and reintegrate a political figure who has been the subject of extensive debate regarding his legacy and impact on the country's recent history. Public perception of this approval is not only marked by Fujimori’s figure but also reflects a growing distrust towards political institutions in Peru. The connection between the measure and APP has raised suspicions about possible political agreements behind the scenes, which could be motivating certain actors to favor a former president for reasons that go beyond legality. The debate over Fujimori’s lifelong pension will not be confined to the political sphere but will also move to the streets and social media, where citizens and civil organizations will begin to mobilize in protest. The situation serves as a clear example of how political decisions can affect the perception of democracy and public trust in their representatives. In this context, it is imperative that the media and civil society remain vigilant over the actions of Congress and other political actors. Transparency and accountability are fundamental to strengthening democracy and ensuring that decisions affecting citizens are made with the utmost clarity. In a country that has experienced dark episodes in its recent history, Alberto Fujimori's lifelong pension represents a symbol of the ongoing struggle for justice and equity. Citizens must not only question the legality of this decision but also reflect on the type of leadership and representation they desire for the future of Peru.