Iran promises a strong response following the assassination of Haniyeh in Tehran.

In a context of rising tension in the Middle East, the President of Iran has made a strong statement regarding the recent assassination of Haniyeh, a Palestinian official on an official visit to Tehran. During a meeting with Ayman Safadi, Jordan's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Iranian leader emphasized that this act will not go unanswered, alluding to the responsibility that he claims lies with the Israeli regime. In his statement, the president stressed that Iran expects "all Islamic countries and the free peoples of the world to strongly condemn these crimes." The attack on Haniyeh, which occurred at his residence in Tehran, has triggered a wave of condemnation in the region. This act, according to the Iranian president, represents a display of the arrogance of the Zionists, who, in his view, continue to carry out aggressions against the oppressed people of Gaza. Iran thus positions itself as a bastion of Palestinian resistance, calling for the unity of Islamic states to "stop Israeli aggression." Despite the vehement statements, the Iranian president has also expressed that his government is committed to working for peace and stability in the region. This apparent contradiction between bellicose rhetoric and the desire for peace raises questions about Tehran's true intentions in such a tumultuous context. The relationship between Iran and Israel has been marked by decades of hostility, with both countries perceiving each other as existential threats. Ayman Safadi, for his part, has condemned the assassination of Haniyeh, describing it as a violation of international norms and humanitarian law. During his visit to Iran, the Jordanian minister emphasized the need to avoid an escalation of violence that could lead to a devastating regional war. In his statements, Safadi has called on the international community to act firmly to protect the security of the region, a message that resonates in a scenario where peace seems increasingly elusive. Safadi's visit to Tehran has been interpreted as an attempt to seek channels of dialogue amid the crisis. The situation in the region is tense, and Arab leaders are trying to balance their relationships with Iran and their ties with the West, in a context where the threat of regional war looms over them. The Jordanian minister has made it clear that his government's position is to seek stability rather than contribute to an escalation of violence. In this context, it is important to remember that Iran has expressed its intention to respond decisively to the assassination of Haniyeh. In the past, the Islamic Republic has carried out direct attacks against Israeli targets in retaliation for previous aggressions, suggesting that the Iranian president's warnings should not be taken lightly. The recent history of conflicts in the region shows that any act of violence can trigger a series of chain reactions, leading all involved parties into a spiral of confrontation. The atmosphere in the region is one of great uncertainty. Warnings of a possible large-scale conflict resonate not only in the offices of political leaders but also in the streets of neighboring countries. The civilian population, always the most affected in these crises, watches with fear as tensions between Iran and Israel could lead to a new cycle of violence. Meanwhile, the international community is closely monitoring these events. The geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East are complex and marked by multiple interests that often conflict. The intervention of external powers, such as the United States and Russia, may influence the outcome of this crisis, but it is clear that the resolution of the conflict will largely depend on the willingness of local actors to seek dialogue and peace. In summary, the situation following Haniyeh's assassination has alarmingly heightened tensions in the region. The words of the Iranian president have made it clear that the Islamic Republic will not turn its back on its allies in the fight against what it perceives as Israeli aggressions. However, the call for peace from both sides poses a complicated dilemma: will they be able to find a path to stability without yielding to provocations? The answer to this question is crucial for the future of the Middle East and its people.