The Latin American left must reflect and distance itself from the failed chavismo.

The regime of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has been the subject of extensive debate in Latin American politics, and critical voices within the democratic left have begun to rise with a clarity that was previously scarce. A deep analysis of the situation is necessary, as well as a strong and unanimous condemnation of a model that, over more than two decades, has brought about an unprecedented humanitarian crisis in the region. Chavismo, far from being a beacon of hope for Latin American peoples, has become the embodiment of the failure of a political project that promised justice and equity. The Venezuelan reality is irrefutable proof that revolutionary ideals can be distorted to an unimaginable level of degradation. Maduro has not only led the country to economic ruin, but he has also sown fear and repression as tools of control. This situation has generated a wave of migration that has impacted all of Latin America, including Peru, where thousands of Venezuelans have been forced to leave their homes in search of better opportunities. The crisis is not just an internal problem of Venezuela; it is a challenge that affects the entire region and requires a firm and clear response from all political actors. However, the reaction from a part of the Latin American left has been disconcerting. Instead of unreservedly condemning Maduro's dictatorship, some sectors have opted for a stance of complicit indifference, sometimes even defending the regime under the pretext of national sovereignty. This double standard generates irrevocable discredit for leftist forces that wish to build a future based on democracy and human rights. The lack of criticism of Maduro only fuels the idea that the left is incapable of recognizing its own excesses and mistakes, which undermines its credibility and commitment to social justice. The call for serious and honest reflection on chavismo is urgent. Leftist leaders in Peru and the rest of Latin America must understand that defending democracy implies not only rejecting corruption and authoritarianism within their own ranks but also distancing themselves from those regimes that, under a progressive discourse, have led their countries to ruin. In this sense, aligning with Maduro's model is a self-goal that can have serious repercussions in the struggle for equality and freedom in the region. Moreover, the failure of chavismo is not an isolated phenomenon. It is a warning about the dangers of populism and authoritarianism that, unfortunately, have resonated in other Latin American nations. The Venezuelan experience should serve as a crucial lesson for those seeking to implement meaningful changes in their countries, reminding them that just means are as important as the ends they pursue. History has shown that tyranny, no matter how benevolent it may appear in its early stages, eventually becomes the oppressor of those it promised to liberate. The need for a clear and decisive response to Maduro's regime also becomes a moral imperative. The peoples of Latin America have suffered firsthand the consequences of despotism, and it is essential that leaders of the democratic left align themselves with the right side of history. This is not just a matter of ideology, but of humanity. The defense of human rights must be the compass guiding any political movement that aspires to improve the lives of its citizens. Therefore, the future of the left in Latin America depends on its ability to dissociate itself from chavismo and condemn its legacy of suffering and corruption. This process of self-evaluation and purification is essential if there is a desire to rebuild trust in a political project that truly represents the aspirations for justice, equality, and freedom of all the peoples in the region. In times of polarization and crisis, the commitment to truth and justice becomes more urgent than ever. The history of the left in Latin America cannot afford to continue being hijacked by the failed model of chavismo. It is time for leaders of the democratic left to speak out firmly and clearly, leaving behind any ambiguity that can only serve to confuse and distort the struggle for true democracy. The situation in Venezuela is a reminder that progress cannot be built on oppression and misery. Finally, the challenge facing the left in Latin America is colossal, but not insurmountable. With a firm, self-critical, and brave stance, it is possible to begin a path towards rebuilding a movement that stands as a true defender of democracy, human rights, and social welfare. The history of Latin American peoples deserves a different and bright future, far from the shadows of failed dictatorships and corrupt leaderships. The time to act is now.