Trump willing to debate with Kamala Harris before early voting in September.

In an unexpected turn in the electoral campaign, Donald Trump has declared his willingness to debate Kamala Harris, the likely Democratic candidate, before the start of early voting scheduled for mid-September in several crucial states. During an interview aired on Fox News, the former president stated that while he is "probably" willing to participate in this verbal clash, his preference would be for the debate not to take place on ABC News, which has scheduled the event for September 10. Trump expressed his disagreement with the idea of a television network profiting financially from his participation. "I don't want to give millions of dollars to ABC to make them rich," he commented, suggesting that Fox News could be a more appropriate alternative to host the debate. This request underscores Trump's strategy of distancing himself from what he perceives as an unfair deal by the media, while also seeking to establish a scenario that favors him. The former president also asserted that facing Harris would be easier than debating Joe Biden, who, according to him, had a stronger support base. Trump has vehemently criticized Biden's decision not to seek re-election, describing it as a "coup" orchestrated by the Democratic Party. This type of rhetoric highlights Trump's strategy to mobilize his base around the idea that current politics is largely a dirty game. Harris, whom Trump described as a "far-left lunatic," has positioned herself as a polarizing figure within the Democratic Party. Her stances on issues such as the economy, social justice, and climate change starkly contrast with the conservative principles that Trump represents. The possibility of a debate between the two candidates could shed light on these differences and offer voters a clear view of the opposing political directions each proposes. The former president referred to Biden's withdrawal as a result of Democratic pressure, suggesting that former President Barack Obama had even warned him about the need to step down. This claim not only calls into question Biden's ability to lead but also reinforces Trump's narrative about the fragility of Democratic leadership in times of crisis. However, Biden's decision not to run may have broader implications for Trump's campaign. Some analysts suggest that despite his apparent advantage, the lack of a strong opponent could lead to lower mobilization among Republican voters. In this context, a debate with Harris could be seen as an opportunity to galvanize his base and demonstrate his ability to challenge the opposition. The recent shooting incident Trump experienced at a rally in Pennsylvania has also highlighted the complexity of his campaign. Speaking about the incident, the former president revealed that his wife, Melania, was following the event live and had difficulty discussing the occurrence. This human and vulnerable comment could resonate with voters, generating empathy and support amid the controversy. The former president, who has often underestimated the capabilities of his opponents, is aware that facing Harris may not be so straightforward. He stated that he is not afraid to debate her, but his remarks indicate an attempt to downplay his opponent before the debate takes place. By labeling her as "far-left," Trump seeks to anchor the debate on issues that resonate with his base, emphasizing the contrast between his ideology and Harris's. Meanwhile, Trump's decision to debate or not becomes a double-edged sword. On one hand, it could solidify his image as a leader who confronts his opponents. On the other, the pressure to participate in a debate could raise questions about his willingness to engage in a serious dialogue about policies, especially at a time when voters seek clarity about the differences between candidates. As the start of early voting approaches, attention is focused on how these debates will unfold and how they will influence the electoral landscape. Both Trump and Harris represent radically different visions for the future of the United States, and the outcome of this confrontation could define not only the trajectory of their individual campaigns but also what lies ahead for the country in the coming years.