Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
The political situation in Peru has taken a troubling turn under the presidency of Dina Boluarte, who, despite having come to power with significant symbolic potential, has increasingly distanced herself from the public scene and the expectations surrounding her administration. This year, the country has witnessed a resurgence of the regressive agenda of certain groups in Congress, the near-total dissolution of an effective opposition, and a notable disinterest on the part of the president in leading significant changes. Dina Boluarte, after becoming the first female president of Peru in a context of political instability, had the opportunity to make a difference. Her rise to power occurred during a period of turmoil following the ousting of Pedro Castillo, which offered her a platform to promote social and economic reforms. However, instead of seizing that moment, her government has been marked by decisions that have weakened the foundations of the state and harmed the country’s international image. Since taking office, Boluarte has opted for a strategy that has led to the collapse of progress in critical sectors such as education and human rights. Increasing repression and a lack of dialogue with the social sectors that initially supported her have been constants in her administration. Instead of becoming a symbol of change and hope, her presidency has been perceived as a continuation of the institutional decline that began with her predecessor. It is undeniable that Boluarte has faced significant challenges. Opposition from Castillo’s supporters and protests in response to police violence have complicated her mandate. However, these challenges do not exempt the president from the responsibility of her decisions. By choosing to remain in power without calling for elections and surrounding herself with a group of hardline collaborators, she has lost the support of those who could have been her allies in seeking necessary reforms. The lack of a political party of her own and her limited government experience have also played a role in her inability to connect with citizens. While her status as a woman and her personal history could have placed her in a privileged position to generate empathy and support, her approach has alienated the middle and lower classes who might have felt represented by her figure. This disconnection has left a void that could have serious repercussions for the country's political future. The effects of this unsatisfactory administration are reflected in public opinion. Polls indicate that a significant portion of the population supports a coup as a response to corruption, highlighting a serious deterioration of trust in institutions. Additionally, the despair among young people is alarming, with many considering leaving the country in search of better opportunities. This scenario poses a monumental challenge for any leader aspiring to restore faith in the political system. As the country approaches new rituals of traditional politics, such as the Fiestas Patrias speech, Boluarte has a crucial opportunity to change the course of her presidency. However, her self-absorbed behavior and persistent reliance on Congress have led many to question whether she has the capacity to lead significant change. If she wishes to avoid being remembered as one of the greatest disappointments in Peru’s history, she must demonstrate a genuine commitment to justice and reform. History judges leaders not only by their intentions but also by their actions. Boluarte will have to face the consequences of her mandate, which includes not only political criticism but also the possibility of prosecution for actions taken during her presidency. This personal burden may be influencing her governing style, leading her to adopt a defensive rather than proactive position. However, time is running out. Opportunities to reverse the current situation are limited, and each passing day without a clear and decisive response to the demands of the citizenry strengthens general discontent. If she does not act swiftly and decisively, Dina Boluarte’s legacy could be marked by dissatisfaction and disillusionment, a cost too high for a country that has fought for its democracy for generations.