The complex legal landscape of Peruvian soccer: the case of Paolo Guerrero

The renowned expert in sports legal issues, Jhonny Baldovino, has shed light on the conflict between Paolo Guerrero and his club, Club Deportivo Universidad César Vallejo, pointing out that this case is not an isolated incident in Peruvian football. According to Baldovino, there have been up to four similar situations to Paolo's so far this year, where players resign from their clubs and controversy arises over possible compensations. Baldovino details the procedure that Paolo Guerrero will follow after resigning from Vallejo, indicating that the player must wait until August 30th to initiate a process before the Conciliation and Dispute Resolution Chamber of the FPF. This process, which could last between 5 and 6 days, would allow Guerrero to become free to sign with another team both in Peru and abroad, as long as it is resolved before the transfer window closes. The expert also addresses the issue of a possible compensation from Universidad César Vallejo to Paolo Guerrero, stating that, so far, there is no specific clause for this case in the player's contract. Baldovino highlights that in previous similar situations, clubs have demanded disproportionate compensation amounts in relation to the players' salaries, making it difficult to reach agreements. Furthermore, Baldovino explains that national labor regulations would govern this case, ruling out the application of FIFA rules regarding player resignations compensations. He also points out that ultimately, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) could intervene if the conflict extends internationally, as in the case of a potential signing of Guerrero by a foreign team. The expert also emphasizes the importance of reaching amicable agreements between the parties involved, as he believes that the legal route could unnecessarily prolong the conflict. Baldovino stresses the need for clubs and players to seek solutions that benefit both parties, thus avoiding possible sanctions or prolonged conflicts. Amidst this situation, reflection arises on the overall situation of Peruvian football. Baldovino criticizes the lack of professionalization in the sports field, especially regarding infrastructure, timely payments, and tournament organization. He also points out that the excessive dependence on television rights as the main source of income for clubs has created a precarious situation in national football. Finally, the expert addresses the role of the Peruvian Football Federation (FPF) in this context, highlighting the need for greater intervention and regulation by the governing body of football in the country. Baldovino calls for improvements in infrastructure, payments, and working conditions for players to ensure sustainable development in the national sports field. In conclusion, the case of Paolo Guerrero and his conflict with Universidad César Vallejo not only highlights the legal complexities in Peruvian football but also reflects the structural and organizational deficiencies that still persist in the national sports field. The intervention of experts like Jhonny Baldovino is crucial to understanding and resolving situations like this, and to propose improvements that promote a more professional and sustainable football in the country.