Controversy over the extension of Pedro Castillo's pre-trial detention: justice or political strategy?

The case of former president Pedro Castillo continues to generate controversy in public opinion and in the judicial sphere. Recently, his lawyer has expressed concern over the extension of the pretrial detention period from 14 to 18 months, arguing that this measure seeks to victimize his client and is part of a dangerous political strategy. According to the attorney, this situation reflects the criminalization and politicization of justice, posing a risk to the country. In that sense, the lawyer also clarified that the request for asylum at the Mexican embassy was not made by Pedro Castillo himself, but by his defense team. He pointed out that the document submitted to the embassy was prepared by the legal team of the former president, and that he did not personally sign it. This fact raises new questions about the case and the legal strategies being employed in Castillo's defense. It is important to remember that Pedro Castillo faces serious accusations related to his tenure as president. Following his national address in which he ordered the closure of Congress and the reorganization of various state institutions, he was accused of rebellion and is facing a 34-year prison sentence request from the Prosecutor's Office. These accusations have triggered a complex and high-profile judicial process that has captured the attention of the public and sparked debates about the country's political situation. The extension of Pedro Castillo's pretrial detention period has elicited mixed reactions in society. While some sectors support the judicial decision citing the gravity of the charges against him, others question the legality and proportionality of this measure, especially in a context of political polarization and social tensions. Castillo's situation has become a central topic of debate in the country, reflecting the divisions and tensions in Peruvian society. Castillo's defense team has announced that they will appeal the decision to extend the pretrial detention period, expressing confidence that his client's rights will be respected and ensuring a fair and transparent judicial process. They have also reiterated their stance that these legal actions aim to harm Castillo and victimize him, rather than ensuring impartial and equitable justice. The legal and media strategy surrounding Pedro Castillo's case continues to evolve, generating expectations among society and political actors. Amidst these controversies and tensions, it is crucial to respect due process and ensure the independence and impartiality of the judicial system. Transparency in handling this case is essential to maintain public trust in institutions and the rule of law. The polarization and politicization of justice only serve to undermine confidence in the legal system and create further uncertainty in an already tense and complex context.