The Fragility of Institutionalism: Political Challenges in Peru

The fragility of institutionalism in our country is a topic that has gained relevance in recent times due to the political decisions being made in Congress and in the government of Dina Boluarte. The concern of many citizens focuses on the lack of representativeness of a political class that seems to respond more to particular interests than to the well-being of society as a whole. It is alarming to see how the reforms that had been implemented with effort and sacrifice to strengthen democracy and transparency are gradually being dismantled. The political class, far from addressing the needs of the population and promoting the country's development, seems more concerned with enriching themselves improperly and protecting their leaders and members. The situation becomes even more distressing when measures are approved that go against the public interest. Examples such as the seventh withdrawal from the pension funds or the proposal to reduce the VAT for hair salons lack solid technical foundations and jeopardize the country's financial stability. The recent discussion in the Constitution Commission, chaired by Martha Moyano, about prohibiting individuals convicted of serious crimes such as corruption, sexual assault, homicide, among others, from running for public office, reveals the lack of commitment of some political leaders in the fight against impunity. How is it possible to allow individuals with criminal records to hold high positions of responsibility in our society? The Congress has also been involved in questionable decisions, such as approving the entry into the teaching career of thousands of teachers without considering their academic merit, or approving regulations that could benefit organized crime by limiting the prosecution of illegal economies. These measures are detrimental to educational quality and public safety, respectively. On the other hand, the government of Dina Boluarte has raised concerns by allowing the return of obsolete and unsafe public transport vehicles, putting citizens' lives at risk. This lack of commitment to modernization and improvement of basic services shows a clear disconnect between the rulers and the real needs of the population. In this scenario of institutional weakness and social discontent, it is essential for citizens to demand greater commitment to the common good from their political representatives. Transparency, accountability, and ethics in public management must be fundamental pillars of any government seeking sustainable and equitable development of the country. It is the responsibility of all Peruvians not only to denounce corrupt and undemocratic practices but also to actively participate in building a fairer and more transparent society. The future of our country depends on the ability of civil society and institutions to work together in building a political system that truly represents the interests of all citizens, not just a few privileged ones.