Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello Vela, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
The United Nations Security Council passed a resolution urging leaders in the Middle East to press Hamas for a cease-fire, with 14 out of 15 council members voting in favor and Russia abstaining. This resolution marked a significant diplomatic victory for the United States, which had previously vetoed three cease-fire resolutions. "The only way to end this cycle of violence and build a durable peace is through a political settlement," emphasized Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. She highlighted that the U.S. would work towards ensuring Israel's acceptance of the deal, while Qatar and Egypt would strive to bring Hamas to the negotiating table. The resolution outlined a three-phase plan starting with an immediate cease-fire, release of hostages, return of displaced Gazans, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. The subsequent phases involve a permanent cease-fire with mutual agreement and a reconstruction plan for Gaza. Israel's representative, Reut Shapir Ben-Naftaly, reiterated her country's objective to use military operations to secure the release of hostages and dismantle Hamas's military capabilities. While not explicitly confirming Israel's acceptance of the terms, she emphasized that Israel would persevere until all hostages were freed. In response, Hamas welcomed aspects of the Security Council resolution, including the call for a permanent cease-fire, prisoner exchange, and reconstruction efforts in Gaza. Russia, despite abstaining from the vote, acknowledged the resolution's widespread support among Arab nations. The drafting of the resolution followed President Biden's announcement of Israel's cease-fire proposal, and the U.S. Mission stated that the deal aligned with Biden's framework. However, Israeli officials have not publicly endorsed the plan and remain ambiguous about their commitment to the cease-fire if Hamas agrees. The resolution's text, which mentions Israel's acceptance of the U.S. proposal while calling for Hamas to do the same, faced criticism for appearing one-sided. Security Council members, including China, supported the resolution to halt the fighting and ensure the release of hostages, despite concerns about the agreement's implementation. The Security Council's efforts to end the conflict and uphold international peace have been hindered by previous deadlocks. China's decision to support this resolution, after vetoing a previous one in March, indicates a shared desire among council members to see an end to the violence and humanitarian crises in Gaza. As the region navigates towards a potential cease-fire, the dynamics of negotiations between parties involved, including Israel, Hamas, and international mediators, will be crucial in determining the resolution's effectiveness and its impact on the long-standing conflict in the Middle East.