The fall of Benavides: A milestone in the struggle for control of the Public Ministry

The downfall of Benavides The removal of Patricia Benavides by the National Council of Justice (JNJ) marks a milestone in the political confrontation for control of the Public Ministry in Peru. This episode puts an end to a turbulent period in which Benavides' tenure at the head of the institution was a source of controversy and internal conflicts. Although Benavides has the possibility to appeal the decision of the JNJ, the chances of reversing her removal seem slim given the decisiveness of the vote against her. Additionally, the judicial route appears to be a complicated path, especially considering the ruling of the Constitutional Court that established the JNJ's jurisdiction to oversee appointments made by the Attorney General. Benavides' removal was motivated, according to the JNJ, by her alleged interference in the case of the magistrate Bersabeth Revilla, supposedly to prevent her from investigating her sister Enma. This accusation, which has also been supported by public opinion, highlights conflicts of interest as one of the central points in Benavides' removal. The proximity of Benavides' possible return to the position from which she had been previously suspended would have been a determining factor in the JNJ's decision to immediately remove her. It is speculated that her return in early June could have led to a series of unintended consequences, which may have prompted a unanimous vote against her. Benavides' removal has uncovered a conspiracy involving various political and judicial actors. According to gathered information, figures such as former Prime Minister Alberto Otárola, congresswoman Martha Moyano, and prosecutor Marita Barreto would have participated in a collusion to thwart Benavides' actions and her denunciation in Congress. The process within the JNJ has been mired in controversy due to the removal of two of its members by Congress, raising questions about the legality of the decisions made. The lack of solid evidence and the speed of the process have raised suspicions about the transparency and impartiality of the institution. The Public Ministry now faces the challenge of proving the accusations that Benavides led a criminal organization that favored congressmen in exchange for votes. The charges include illicit payments, bribes, and alleged criminal actions that must be clarified within the framework of judicial investigations. The figure of Jaime Villanueva, a key advisor in this scheme, has been central in the revelations that have shaken the Public Ministry. His confessions and accusations have cast doubt on several important actors in the Peruvian political and judicial scene, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty and tensions regarding the veracity of his testimonies. Benavides' removal has exposed a series of irregularities and abuses within the Public Ministry, highlighting the need for a thorough review of its practices and the urgency to restore public confidence in the institution. The upcoming legal scenario promises to be complex and full of challenges, with implications that could redefine the course of justice in the country. Amid accusations, intrigues, and power struggles, Benavides' downfall represents a crucial chapter in the recent history of the Peruvian judicial system. The repercussions of this political-judicial scandal are yet to be determined, but they will undoubtedly set a precedent in the fight against corruption and impunity in the country. The citizenry awaits clear answers and decisive actions to ensure that justice prevails over individual interests and political maneuvers.