Release of "Cursed Frank" sparks controversy in public opinion.

The release of Francisco Enrique Mogollón Piña, also known as "Maldito Frank," has sparked intense debate in the public opinion. The case took an unexpected turn after the judge of the First Permanent Preliminary Investigation Court of Condevilla ruled out his involvement in the murder of businessman Macchiavelli Laura Lame in Santa Anita. According to an official statement, a forensic anthropology examination presented in the trial reportedly demonstrated that Mogollón Piña was not involved in the kidnapping and subsequent death of the businessman. Judge Roxana Castro explained that the Venezuelan citizen voluntarily appeared in court and met the established requirements, such as signing the appearance registry for defendants. During the hearing, the prosecutor failed to present compelling evidence proving the lack of residential, familial, and work ties of Mogollón. Faced with this situation, the judge decided to impose judicial appearance with restrictions instead of preventive detention, as the suspect has no criminal record and does not pose a procedural danger or a risk to the investigation. The judicial decision has sparked mixed reactions in society, with some sectors questioning the effectiveness of the judicial system in the fight against crime. On the other hand, human rights defenders have emphasized the importance of respecting due process and the presumption of innocence of every individual, regardless of their origin or background. It is crucial to remember that justice must be based on objective evidence and respect the fundamental rights of all citizens involved in a judicial process. The case of "Maldito Frank" highlights the importance of a rigorous and impartial investigation to ensure truth and justice in each case.