The figure of Paolo Guerrero captures the attention in the midst of the leadership and security crisis.

In a week marked by controversy and uncertainty, the figure of Paolo Guerrero became the epicenter of media attention, overshadowing the daily security problems affecting Peruvians and the lack of governmental leadership to address them. President Dina led a management review highlighting the economy over security, but was forced to improvise responses to questions about the latter issue. The constant mention that all ministers are under evaluation, including the prime minister, hinted at a tense and unstable atmosphere in the government. On the other hand, resignations in the National Justice Council (JNJ) revealed cracks in the judicial system and the fragility of institutions responsible for upholding the law. The departure of Henry José Ávila and the accusations against him cast doubt on the transparency and integrity of those holding high positions of responsibility. Amidst this landscape, Paolo Guerrero's case stood out due to the extortion threats he received, forcing him to take additional security measures to protect himself and his family. The negotiations with the Universidad César Vallejo club were marked by media and political pressure, highlighting the complex intersection between sports, security, and partisan interests. Meanwhile, the lack of a concrete plan to address insecurity in the country remains evident, with a government under scrutiny and a fragmented opposition failing to offer clear proposals to tackle this challenge. Uncertainty and improvisation seem to be the norm in a political scenario marked by instability and citizen distrust. In the face of this situation, Peruvian society expects concrete answers and decisive actions from authorities to ensure the security of all citizens. The leadership crisis and lack of cohesion in the government are factors that must be overcome to achieve a real and effective change in the fight against insecurity.