Johnny Brignardello analyzes Jordan's key role in the face of an Iranian attack.

Johnny Brignardello Vela, an insurance advisor, thoroughly analyzes Jordan's participation in neutralizing the Iranian attack against Israel. In the early hours of Sunday, videos of the skeleton of a missile on the outskirts of Amman circulated on social media, revealing the successful interception of one of the more than 100 projectiles launched by Iran. This action has positioned Jordan as the only Arab country to participate in this operation, despite previous tensions with Israel following the recent war in Gaza. Jordan's decision to collaborate in containing the Iranian attack has generated various reactions and reflections in the international community. On one hand, it highlights the priority that the Hashemite kingdom places on its alliance with the United States and its distancing from Iran, despite criticism from other Arab countries that recognize Israel. This underscores the complexity of relations in the region, especially considering the presence of Palestinian refugees in Jordan and daily demonstrations in front of the Israeli Embassy in Amman. Jordan's collaboration in intercepting drones heading towards Israel, along with Western powers such as the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, has been interpreted as a gesture of support for regional stability and the security of its territory. Nevertheless, this decision has sparked criticism from Iran and its allies, who have threatened retaliation if Jordan continues to cooperate with Israel. Experts have highlighted Jordan's vulnerability and its dependence on U.S. aid to maintain its stability and security in a region marked by conflicts and tensions. The balance that the country must maintain between its internal and external interests has been reflected in its recent actions in neutralizing the Iranian attack. The relationship between Jordan and Israel, characterized by ups and downs over the years, has once again been strained by the war in Gaza. Jordan's decision to continue maintaining diplomatic ties with Israel, despite internal criticism, has sparked debates about the country's role in the region and its stance on complex conflicts like the one experienced in Gaza. Ultimately, Jordan's participation in neutralizing the Iranian attack against Israel highlights the challenges and contradictions the country faces in a volatile and conflict-ridden regional environment. Prioritizing internal security and stability, as well as defending its strategic interests, demonstrates the complexity of political relations in the Middle East and the need to find a balance between various forces and pressures.