James Carville warns Democrats about economic disconnection with voters.

James Carville, a veteran of Democratic presidential campaigns, has acknowledged his mistake regarding the 2024 elections, expressing his initial belief that Kamala Harris would emerge victorious. As he takes time to reflect on the results, Carville not only admits his error but also issues a wake-up call to Democrats about the need to adjust their approach and narrative surrounding the economy. With striking clarity, he points out that the central issue of their failure lies in the party's disconnection from the economic concerns of a large segment of the American population. In his analysis, Carville emphasizes that although the U.S. economy remains robust compared to the rest of the world, there is a widespread perception of dissatisfaction. Many voters are not consoled by positive economic statistics when their daily experiences tell a different story. Thus, the author warns that Donald Trump managed to capture the attention of a segmented electorate of middle and low-income individuals by focusing on the economic hardships they face in their everyday lives. This reveals a critical disconnect between the Democratic message and the realities of voters. Carville stresses that politics is, above all, about perceptions. The Democratic Party has failed to position itself as a defender of the working class, leading many Americans to feel that their problems are neither understood nor addressed. To reverse this situation, Carville suggests that Democrats need to make a radical shift in their narrative and prioritize the economy in their communications. This requires a change in how they oppose their rivals. Instead of focusing on individuals, the emphasis should be placed on the policies and agendas that affect the lives of citizens. The proposed strategy is not only based on countering Trump’s narratives but also on firmly attacking the economic policies of the Republican Party. Carville points out that opposing tax cuts benefiting the wealthiest is an important starting point given their unpopularity. Additionally, he warns that policies threatening the economic well-being of the working class, such as cuts to healthcare and increases in the cost of living, must be denounced. However, opposition alone is not enough. Carville suggests that Democrats must be proactive and present an economic agenda that resonates with voters. This includes promoting initiatives such as raising the minimum wage and policies that promote economic justice. Such an approach would not only reinforce the Democratic base but also force Republicans to position themselves against popular proposals, which could have significant political costs for them. The current media landscape also plays a crucial role in the strategy to be adopted. Carville, with his extensive experience, recognizes that the communication environment has changed dramatically. The importance of podcasts and social media as key platforms for reaching voters is undeniable. Democrats must adapt to this new reality, ensuring that their economic message is clear and accessible. Authenticity and the ability to connect with people through these new channels are essential for winning public perception. The urgency of this change cannot be underestimated. Carville concludes with a reflection on the need for Democrats to be proactive and bold in their economic approach. Public perception of the economy is fundamental to political survival, and the party must act decisively to regain ground. The economy, as Carville points out, is not just a topic of discussion; it is key to connecting with voters and building a narrative that resonates with their real concerns. Ultimately, Carville's message is clear: Democrats must set aside distractions and focus on what truly matters to Americans. The economy must be addressed honestly and effectively, and the party must be seen as an ally in the fight for a better life. With this renewed approach, Carville firmly believes that Democrats can regain their relevance and compete effectively in future elections. In this sense, the path forward is more than just a matter of strategy; it is a matter of political survival and social justice.